Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's gotta be a Poe. Even Young Earth Creationists realize that people pee.So, atheists, how you going to explain this one, huh?
You know, I find myself saying that more and more, and lately it seems I end up concluding "Huh...I guess they really are that stupid" a lot more often.No-one could possibly be that dense.
Its perfectly tailored to the creationist audience who can be counted on simply accepting something as truth when it supports their position negating the need to explain any glaring problems with the claim that a more skeptical person would pick up.
I doubt its a poe because we're talking about the same people who argue the continued existance of chimps is a valid arguement against them sharing a common ancestor with humans. These people voluntarily embrace ignorance and allow themselves to be mislead.
No doubt this is why such fundamentalist belief is associated with attrocities because they don't question the justification behind murder and torture but rather assume it must be justified because their religion or religious leaders say so.
But creationists aren't using this to argue for creationism.
It is exclusively being used by people to make fun of creationism.
I guess you missed the Channel Four (UK) documentary where this was actually taught in an Islamic school. The children had been taught a strawman version of evolution that stated humans evolved from chimps leading the kids to ask this question.
I don't watch channel four in the UK.
Is this available on youtube?
Have you heard of evaporation?It makes a good point though. I mean, we pee it all out right, so shouldn't we all be drinking pee by now? Why aren't the oceans yellow?
Have you heard of evaporation?
Creationists rarely argue for creationism any way, they almost always argue against evolution.But creationists aren't using this to argue for creationism.
Really! Please share your evidence, or at least examples. Thanks.It is exclusively being used by people to make fun of creationism.