Mike.Hester
Member
So you believe in censorship?Should a person be proud of stepping other people just because it is "fun" to mock prophet Muhammad?
I don't think so.
Free speech yes, but not for all costs.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you believe in censorship?Should a person be proud of stepping other people just because it is "fun" to mock prophet Muhammad?
I don't think so.
Free speech yes, but not for all costs.
When it comes to racism, hate speech and so, yes I do.So you believe in censorship?
I agree. Well saidKilling and demanding silence are unreasonable and not compatible with free soeech.
And Hedbo wasnt insulting Islam. They were insulting extremists. Thats a crucial thing to understand. If Muslims want to get upset, they need to get upset at their fellow Muslims who are extremist bungholes who prompted the cartoons in tue first place. But true colors were shown as France stood up for free speech while Muslim radicals murdered over a cartoon.
So, what "if it will raise anger in Muslims". Deal with it, I would say. Esp. if you claim to be spiritualYou are aware of that to draw Muhammad is against Islam, and when done it will rase anger from some but maybe not all Muslims, is it then wrong of Muslims to say that it is wrong?
Would be dumm if we let "Muslims who are unable to control their anger" rule over us.
Lesson one in spiritual life = "Control your senses, especially your anger"
Amen to that.I too agree with Putin on that. People should be welcomed. They are not welcome to change our ways to turn us into the cultures they left. If they want that, they should return.
It is not mocking the prophet of peace by objectively pointing out his shortcomings per the Hadith and Koran> ownership of slaves, hatred towards Jews, marriage to his adopted sons wife and a child bride of 9 years of age, referring to Ethiopians as raisin heads, a women's word is only worth half compared to a man>just to name a few. All holy prophets have their shortcomings.So you're seriously saying that speaking against the prophet Muhammad is equal to a charge like those mentioned in the U.S. law you quoted?
Those who DO NO MORE THAN SPEAK against Muhammad are your "enemies?" As in, you are seeking to defeat them? What does it mean to wage war against these types of "enemies" in your estimation?
- "levies war against"
- "adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort"
Thank goodness for the 1st Amendment!When it comes to racism, hate speech and so, yes I do.
You guys in America has that one yes. But no reason to be racist or haterThank goodness for the 1st Amendment!
So if a person supports freedom of speech, he is a racist? Freedom of speech applies to everyone.You guys in America has that one yes. But no reason to be racist or hater
By the way does the 1st Amendment count for American Muslims too? Or just for some?
Freedom of speech don't make someone racist, the content of what is said does.So if a person supports freedom of speech, he is a racist? Freedom of speech applies to everyone.
No use. Allah blinds some people and hardens their hearts. Blame Allah.We can only hope for the best
lā ḥawla wa-lā quwwata ʾillā bi-llāhiSo if a person supports freedom of speech, he is a racist?
You say Allah has blinded me?No use. Allah blinds some people and hardens their hearts. Blame Allah.
lā ḥawla wa-lā quwwata ʾillā bi-llāhi
That is blasphemy.
Thank you.Not you. Happy Birthday, Amanaki. Have a nice time.
I was talking about some/many/most(?) Pakistani people.
All religions are the opium of the people!Not you. Happy Birthday, Amanaki. Have a nice time.
I was talking about some/many/most(?) Pakistani people.
What's the name of the newspaper?Well, guys. In today's newspaper they say that this person was an American citizen who happened to be visiting Pakistan, the country of his origin. The news paper used the words 'lured into Pakistan'. I hope you are aware of that. Sometimes we get marginal news late. He was sure a fool to return to Pakistan after what he said.
Shaytan?Who's to be faulted if a way of life is found to be appealing
I wouldn't take it personally, but I would do what I could to prevent them from spreading the image and to get them to take responsibility for what they've done.They drew Muhammad. I am very certain they were ridiculing extremists. Just because they did ot doesn't mean you have to or should take it personally.
There are nice practical religions also.All religions are the opium of the people!
Times of India. They are generally truthful.What's the name of the newspaper?
Sashaytan?Shaytan?