Now, my question is that, with respect to His second coming, would His kingdom appear in the same way after He would leave the World again? Or you believe that the second time He wouldn't leave the world? If so, which verses of the Bible we can conclude that from?
We beleive that Jesus would not be returning in a physical sense ever again. The kingdom that he was going to be the king of, resides in heavens besides Gods throne. This is why Jesus said the following:
John 14:19
A little longer and the world will behold me no more, but YOU will behold me, because I live and YOU will live"
These words he spoke to his 12 apostles. They would behold him again because it was to them that the opportunity to rule with Christ was given. So they will see him in heaven. That is why the apostle Paul said,
“Even if we have known Christ according to the flesh, certainly we now know him so no more.”—2 Cor. 5:16. They knew Jesus in the flesh, but after he was resurrected, he was no longer in the flesh, he was now a powerful spirit person.
We can also look at the words of the Angels who spoke to the Apostles after Christ ascended to heaven:
Acts 1:9
And after he had said these things, while they were looking on, he was lifted up and a cloud caught him up from their vision. 10 And as they were gazing into the sky while he was on his way, also, look! two men in white garments stood alongside them, 11 and they said: “Men of Gal′i‧lee, why do YOU stand looking into the sky? This Jesus who was received up from YOU into the sky will come thus in the same manner as YOU have beheld him going into the sky.
Jesus was only visible when he was speaking to them, as soon as he finished speaking,
'a cloud caught him up from their vision' so he was no longer visible...but they kept looking for him. The angles told the apostles that he would come in the same way - invisibly. So we have Jesus words that the world of mankind would not see him again, and the Angels words that he would come again invisibly.
Yes, I agree that, since He was the King, thus the Kingdom was among them.
Now, how is it then, He says: "Kingdom does not come with observation"? because if we say Jesus was among them and they were seeing him, then it came with observation. My understanding is that, He meant that His heavenly Kingdom, does not come with worldly power, as they had expected, that He would actually rule people, in a worldly sense. But since He would be the King of the Hearts, thus He said, My Kingdom does not come with observation.
I guess this really depends on exactly when the kingdom began to rule. The truth is that it did not begin to rule while he was on earth...You may recall during his ministry that he taught his followers to pray: “Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place, as in heaven, also upon earth.” Obviously at that time, the kingdom had not been established otherwise there would be no need to pray for it.
Even after he returned to heaven he did not begin ruling as king immediately. Paul quotes from Psalm 110:1 which says: “This man [Jesus] offered one sacrifice for sins perpetually and sat down at the right hand of God, from then on awaiting until his enemies should be placed as a stool for his feet.” (Hebrews 10:12, 13) He was waiting for the command from God to “Go subduing in the midst of your enemies.” as Psalm 110:2 prophetically states.
When that time came, he began cleansing the heavens of Satan and his angels. The result of that war in heaven is stated in these words: Revelation 12:10 “Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!”
You have to remember too, that Jesus said that the kingdom would be restored when the 'appointed times of the nations' came to their end. Bible chronology puts that in the year 1914. And that explains very well why world events have gotten worse since that time, rather then better. The spoken of in Revelation says "so down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called devil and satan....woe for the earth...for the devil has come down to you having great anger knowing he has a short period of time" The short period of time is the 'last days' ... those 'critical times hard to deal with'
From all the scriptural and historical evidence, we can rightly conclude that Jesus was enthroned as king in 1914.
Now, with respect to His second coming, do you believe that His kingdom would come with observation? If that's the case, are there any verses to support this belief?
it will be in the sense of 'perceiving' rather then physically 'seeing'
Revelation 1:7 say
“Look! He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, and those who pierced him; and all the tribes of the earth will beat themselves in grief because of him.”
The world will get to be in such a state, that everyone will then understand or recognize that Christ is present. There will be enough physical evidence for people to realise that he is there and in that way “every eye will see him” even though they will refuse to accept him as it was in the day of Noah.
Matt 24:36 “Concerning that day and hour nobody knows, neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father. For just as the days of Noah were, so the presence of the Son of man will be. For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark; and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the Son of man will be.
And people are already starting to recognize that all is not well. Here are a few quotes:
1993 Out of Control—Global Turmoil on the Eve of the Twenty-First Century. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former head of the U.S. National Security Council. He writes:
“The onset of the twentieth century was hailed in many commentaries as the real beginning of the Age of Reason. . . . Contrary to its promise, the twentieth century became mankind’s most bloody and hateful century.... Never before in history was killing so globally pervasive, never before did it consume so many lives, never before was human annihilation pursued with such concentration of sustained effort on behalf of such arrogantly irrational goals.”
Professor Hugh Thomas
“The twentieth century—although generally one of social improvement and heightened governmental concern for the lives of the poor—has been dominated by the machine gun, the tank, the B-52, the nuclear bomb and, finally, the missile. It has been marked by wars more bloody and destructive than those of any other age.”
the editor of the Miami, U.S.A., Herald: “Anyone with half a logical mind can put together the cataclysmic events of the past few years and see that the world is at a historic threshold. . . . It will change forever the way men live.”
Lewis Mumford: “Civilization is going downhill. Very definitely. . . . In the past when civilizations went downhill, it was a relatively local phenomenon. . . . Now, with the world more closely knit and held together by modern communications, when civilization goes downhill, the whole planet goes down.”
A History of the Modern World—From 1917 to the 1980s, by Paul Johnson “It may be that, after the seeming inevitability of two world wars, the creation of nuclear weapons was an admonitory gift, which spared us a third clash of great nations and introduced the longest period of general peace, albeit a peace of terror, since Victorian times. . . . What had gone wrong with humanity? Why had the promise of the nineteenth century been dashed? Why had the twentieth century turned into an age of horror or, as some would say, evil?”
Civilization on Trial, by Arnold Toynbee “There is now a recognition of the human rights of people of all classes, nations, and races; yet at the same time we have sunk to perhaps unheard-of depths of class warfare, nationalism, and racialism. These bad passions find vent in cold-blooded, scientifically planned cruelties; and the two incompatible states of mind and standards of conduct are to be seen to-day, side by side, not merely in the same world, but sometimes in the same country and even in the same soul.”
The preface in 1919—The Year Our World Began, by William K. Klingaman.
“Like a ghost that lingered past the appointed hour, the nineteenth century—with its essential orderliness, its self-confidence, and its faith in human progress—had tarried until August 1914, when the major European powers suffered a collective attack of muddleheadedness that led directly to the senseless slaughter of millions of the best young men of a generation. Four and a half years later, as the world tried to pick up the pieces after the wrenching cataclysm of the Great War, it became apparent to many (but by no means all) contemporary observers that the last remaining vestiges of the old order had been swept away, and that mankind had entered a new age that was considerably less rational and less forgiving of human imperfections. Those who had expected peace to usher in a better world found their hopes betrayed in 1919.”
