Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
Any belief to the contrary is a failure on your part not mine.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One X, therefore one God
- Thread starter Ostronomos
- Start date
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
For those who comprehend the argument you will realize that the subset s contains the powerset S.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Incorrect. You do not appear to understand the concept of logic. You argument was far from logical. Perhaps i f yo tried to break it down you could see your errors.
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
I trust that you are intelligent enough to follow and come up with something better. We await your disproof. Please Dont keep us in suspense.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope, I do not need to disprove anything. The burden of proof lies upon the person making the positive claim. By the way, if you understood logic you would have known this already.
I have a magical blue dragon in my garage. Prove that I don't have one.
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
I've done my part ten times over. There's no point in engaging you further.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Nope. You have not done so even once. I can see that you do not know what a logical argument is. Let me help you.
First let's see what sort of logical argument you try to use in the OP.
"X = matter or non-object. Information can have meaning without matter. This is how a misunderstanding of reality can be created by mind. Reality is comparable to self-configuration. Wisdom is information coming from a single source (reality). Meaningless information comes from many (objects)."
Okay, that makes no sense at all. It does not follow the form of any logical argument that I know of. Please read this article. You can skip down to the part of the article where they give different sorts of logical arguments. Actually I just made it so my link opens up on that section:
List of valid argument forms - Wikipedia
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
*nods politely and walks away*
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I will take that as an acknowledgment that you finally realize that your argument was not logical.
Whew! It took long enough.
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
Your sarcasm certainly surpasses all expectations.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I was being hopeful.
Okay, you either did not read or did not understand the link. Do you know anything about logic at all?
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
I don't need to know logic to formulate a coherent argument. Don't you have a toy or something to play with?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Actually you do. You have not made one coherent argument here. And you are my toy right now.
Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
Oh look a squirrel!
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Hmm, that may work on you.
Are you ready to try to form a logical argument yet? Let me save us some time, you won't. Logic is not your friend.