mickiel
Well-Known Member
Mickiel, it is not enough for you to say that "This particular thing is proof for God."
You must say, "This particular thing is proof of God BECAUSE...."
."
I must do nothing that you say.
Peace.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mickiel, it is not enough for you to say that "This particular thing is proof for God."
You must say, "This particular thing is proof of God BECAUSE...."
."
I'll never understand the Atheist, their animals, many of them here have said so themselves, their Apes. The mere mindset of thinking yourself to be an animal, is a seduction I hope never sweeps me, and its proof that the mind of man without God, is capable of reducing itself to anything.
Peace.
Yes it is, it was God who wanted the confusion, which is why he scattered language, a thing which still causes confusion until this day. If humans would have been allowed to keep just one language, then I think God viewed that as " Rushing things", because human ignorance would have grown too fast, too soon, and to destructive, our knowledge would have increased too much too early.
Peace.
The suffering in humanity was ordered by God, and it really hurts. Nothing escapes Gods will, not even unbelieving Atheist, they are subject to God and the suffering. But have you ever examined the suffering in humanity? Looked at it closely? It has a certain order to it.
And I want to go into that.
Peace.
In all seriousness, Mickiel, have you ever encountered anything, anything at all, no matter how insignificant it might be, that you did not consider to be "another proof of God" ?
I am serious about everything I write , and about every proof of God. And I have many more to post over the years. Before I am done, no doubt will be left.
Peace.
In all seriousness, Mickiel, have you ever encountered anything, anything at all, no matter how insignificant it might be, that you did not consider to be "another proof of God" ?
I believe you are serious. I have not suggested otherwise.
Now, could you please answer this question:
All these Atheist running around pretending that God does not exist, they know their own lives are proof of God.
Peace.
Music is a quality of organized sound, a tool.
This sound becomes a link between your Subjective and Objective Mind
Music is a form of escapist entertainment, its usefulness is in its emotional pleasure and the allegories it contains for the listener.
If you're a Buddhist you tend to hear Buddha in everything, a Christian hears Christ in everything etc. It's what you have attached to the music which is giving what you 'perceive' a divine meaning.
I strongly suggest we turn out the lights and quietly tip toe out of the room and leave him is his misery and delusions, if we all do that he will have no one left to insult him and his endless whimpering will end.
What you have provided is opinion, not evidence.
Show me something that I can see the same way that you do.
Well said...and you are correct. And as for the "belief" of common decent Mickiel puts forth...it's incorrect...Common Decent is evidence of the evolutionary process. We can't, nor has anyone been able...even here on RF...to show any evidence of a god.
.
That couldn't be the case since God is a mental construct of our mind.
Shulmu
Atheist are amoung the strongest evidences for God existing, humans charged to the negative. I have often stated that the positive proves that the negative exist, and vice versa. Atheist distian for God, simply proves he exist. The klu klux klan distain for blacks, simply proves that blacks exist. When one force strongly opposes another force, they simply prove each other.
Peace.