No, 'design' is not just logical order of some arbitrary degree; nor is it just 'random chance' that governs evolution. It is the selection pressures on variations in traits in populations of organisms.. . . I would say the problem is assuming the Pentium chip reflects design while the human brain doesn't.
Naturally it's fair to say the human brain wasn't designed in a man-made factory by a conscious human being. And yet if you categorize design as logical order of such a degree as to imply someone or something acted on it based on something other than random chance, the human brain possesses design.
If natural selection, based on evolving living organism, and functioning within the laws of physics, leads to something like a human eye, or brain (and the biologists tell us that the eye has occurred in more than one evolutionary path) then clearly the environment that selects for biological evolution is some sort of factory able to create functional order of biblical proportions. Exhibit one, the human eye. Exhibit two, the human brain.
John
No, biological evolution is not "some sort of factory." That is an improper analogy. Exhibit: the diversity of life and the interconnected nature of ecosystems on Earth.