Links.The collusion has definitely been confirmed.
I demand links!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Links.The collusion has definitely been confirmed.
Don't you remember when it got somebody into the White House about a year ago?You got a guy in a Trump hat, with a U.S. flag saying a Trump catch phrase "make America great again" - it just seems a little too perfect.
Why do openly armed people raise a red flag for you sometimes, but not always?Of course it very well could have been some random idiot but it was reported that he was openly armed which also raises a red flag for me.
Where's his 2nd Amendment rights?I would expect that shortly after a shooting if a non L.E. person shows up nearby with a gun that police would stop and question them which would then reveal the persons name.
You need yet another link to the ouster of Trump appointee Flynn? Who not only colluded with Russians, but lied about having done so.Links.
I demand links!
I don't have guns either. But if violence hits closer to home, it's nice to know I can at least even the odds by owning one.I don't have a gun. I feel just fine and secure. Maybe in the movies it's the way of the world, but in reality there is no evidence to support your claim.
The collusion has definitely been confirmed. It must take a monumental amount of cognitive dissonance to think that indictments, plea bargains, and at least one guilty plea means nothing. It's just a matter of Mueller figuring out who all was involved and who all knew about it.
Let's just say that your slightly partisan interpretation of events in the newsYou need yet another link to the ouster of Trump appointee Flynn? Who not only colluded with Russians, but lied about having done so.
Interpretation?Let's just say that your slightly partisan interpretation of events in the news
is less than convincing when claiming that collusion has been established.
That's a low standard of proof.Interpretation?
True or false:
Flynn had conversation with Russians that he later lied about under oath.
Tom
No one has a problem with you owning a weapon to defend your home.I don't have guns either. But if violence hits closer to home, it's nice to know I can at least even the odds by owning one.
The president appoints someone, who he has been warned against, and it turns out the guy really did lie.That's a low standard of proof.
No link to an objective verification of collusion then, eh?
Any links for your "known facts"?The president appoints someone, who he has been warned against, and it turns out the guy really did lie.
What is it that you want proof of, exactly? Flynn colluded with the Russians, that is a known fact. Trump was warned against appointing him for that reason. That's another known fact. Trump did anyway, that's a known fact.
The only real questions left are about why Trump and Flynn did what they did.
Tom
The usual song and dance where I refer to what people actually say? Yep. Banning assault weapons =/= "getting rid of any gun" nor does repealing the second ammendment.Post edited.
Oh?
Repeal the Second Amendment? Almost Half of Democrats Say Yes | National Review
http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/02/left-will-finally-admit-want-repeal-second-amendment/
Boulder City Council Unanimously Votes To Ban Assault Weapons, High-Capacity Magazines
katu.com/news/investigators/ceasefire-oregon-nra-agree-assault-weapons-ban-would-bar-nearly-all-semi-automatic-sales
Want to change your statement "Again, no ones talking about getting rid of any gun." or are you going to do your usual song and dance?
Not for the billions of people who feel perfectly adequately "in control" without being armed. But whatever. I'm not going to prise you free from your bunker mentality with facts and logic. If a firearm makes you feel magically "in control", I'm not trying to take that away from you. I would like to suggest some healthier alternatives, but they'd only be misconstrued, so whatever.Yep. But that's just the way of the world.
Ha ha ha, no.Wow do you have anything more than sensationalism.
The hillarious thing to me is that if this clown had been wearing a Hillary hat, you would be outraged at the mere suggestion it was a Trump supporter trying to make Democrats look bad.Why that would be impossible. Dem liberats would never stoop to such a thing just to make Trump supporters look bad.
Think of it as special operations for the politically extreme in attempts to seed discord and sway public opinion.The hillarious thing to me is that if this clown had been wearing a Hillary hat, you would be outraged at the mere suggestion it was a Trump supporter trying to make Democrats look bad.
Possible? Sure. Plausible? Nuh-uh.Think of it as special operations for the politically extreme in attempts to seed discord and sway public opinion.
Just entertaining plausibility. "0)
Obviously Obama's faultI don't know about you guys, but I have zero trust in strangers using weapons properly in public.
Your post is a wonderful invitation to show how cops use guns in public.I don't know about you guys, but I have zero trust in strangers using weapons properly in public.
Why do openly armed people raise a red flag for you sometimes, but not always?
Where's his 2nd Amendment rights?
I see it as an "opened" statement. If you read this, you can see what I mean:Not for the billions of people who feel perfectly adequately "in control" without being armed. But whatever. I'm not going to prise you free from your bunker mentality with facts and logic. If a firearm makes you feel magically "in control", I'm not trying to take that away from you. I would like to suggest some healthier alternatives, but they'd only be misconstrued, so whatever.