Congratulations to France for yet again shunning Le Pen's nationalistic demagoguery.
That's good news.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Congratulations to France for yet again shunning Le Pen's nationalistic demagoguery.
Just drop it. This rampant voter fraud nonsense is just as real as the Easter Bunny or Freddy Kruger. But to go on about it regarding another country? You may as well profess an unwavering belief in the existence of Grendel and the Balrog and Darth Vader.They can announce the winner quickly, they require voter identification.
Dites ça aux toasts ou aux frites.Sucks to be French.
You have to show ID in America as well. And there were no serious disputes to the election, only clowns running around who are deathly frightened of their own shadow.I'll continue a little from my previous post. Not only are votes counted as they occur each voter must present a photo ID. So identification is made before the vote is cast.
Voter identification costs are minimal but provide increased confidence in the results. If, as you say, there isn’t rampant voter fraud it would still be of value. If you are wrong it eliminates potential voter fraud. IOW there are many good reasons to have voter identification. Opposing voter identification only helps those that benefit from uncertainty.Just drop it. This rampant voter fraud nonsense is just as real as the Easter Bunny or Freddy Kruger. But to go on about it regarding another country? You may as well profess an unwavering belief in the existence of Grendel and the Balrog and Darth Vader.
This statement is factually incorrect. When voting by mail there is no mechanism for showing voter identification.You have to show ID in America as well.
They seem to have their priorities better straightened out than America.Sucks to be French.
Sucks to be French.
congrats on making La Pen a twice rejected stinky twat nugget.
This statement is factually incorrect. When voting by mail there is no mechanism for showing voter identification.
Voter identification costs are minimal but provide increased confidence in the results. If, as you say, there isn’t rampant voter fraud it would still be of value. If you are wrong it eliminates potential voter fraud. IOW there are many good reasons to have voter identification. Opposing voter identification only helps those that benefit from uncertainty.
I think a Macron victory was basically a guarantee against Le Pen! As notoriously (well known) leftist and liberal as France has been in the 19th, 20th, and 21st century, I'm amazed that Le Pen has done a fraction of as well as she has, in a country with that reputation.Unfortunate, but not surprising.
What? No! It is fake news. They moved the ballots at night when a water main broke. They allowed illegals to vote. Um Um, we have sworn affidavits.Le Pen has conceded.
le gars de l'oreiller?What? No! It is fake news. They moved the ballots at night when a water main broke. They allowed illegals to vote. Um Um, we have sworn affidavits.
That and several other factors. Many of them do not live close to places where they can renew ID and without a car it can easily take an entire day. Something that they can ill afford.Voter fraud isn't a problem in the US. All voter ID does is disenfranchise the poor, who move frequently and whose addresses on their ID won't match the address on the voter roll, preventing them from voting.
Oui, oui!!le gars de l'oreiller?