• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Killing for apostacy is against Quran.

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
And when the Bible says wives should submit to their husbands, do you think it means they should try to practice their husband's virtues?

In case of pardon, God says "pardon, do you not love that God should pardon you?", so he is correct in his intuition.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
This is why Quran does not directly say everything about Salah explicitly but actually proves each component and words implicitly. It's because it's a book of insights and proofs.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Also an interesting question would be: IF your Scripture would tell you "To kill for apostacy is okay/needed", would you "agree?"

I would not and left Islam for 5 years because of bad translations according to Quran that I thought Quran was flawed as a result including the fact I believe it commanded to slavery, made woman into half a witness, etc.
:)
Same for me, respect others (non) faith is essential

You can't let scripture triumph over your nature and reason
:)
I always call it: Common Sense before Divine Sense

For example in 3:7
:)
1 of my 4 favorite Koran verses
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
:)
1 of my 4 favorite Koran verses

If people had any effort to stick to what is clear proofs and insights in Quran and Sunnah, and not follow ambiguities of what their scholars emphasize on and teach, everything, justice, the whole world at peace, all that would've been achieved from my point of view.

3:7 is super important.
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member

To me, this reads a bit like if someone turns away from Allah, don't try to bring them back because Allah made them turn so it's useless for you to try. Apostate only want to convince you that Allah's message is false and that you should disbelieve like them. Don't make friends with them. Let them flee or leave if they want to, but if they try to return then kill them all with no quarter given. Take no poisoners or slaves, but be smart about it a little bit. If they sought help from an ally of yours, leave them be and live amongst those allies in peace. If they come back in repentance, then leave them be to. If they want to be your allies against other enemies of yours, then make peace with them and use them as such. If they find a home in amongst your enemies and try to cause you harm then feel free to kill them all.

It does indeed doesn't sanction the killing of apostates nor give free reign to kill them all, but it does seem to sanction their exile and makes it very apparent that those apostate aren't to be liked in general. It also seem to show that apostasy can be forgiven if sincere and that you must give them a chance if demand from pardon comes from them.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Out of curiosity what is the rest of your four favorites?
These were useful for me, in a few replies I made on RF about Koran
Sura 3, The Amramites (Ãli-‘Imrãn) Quran The Final Testament, translated by Rashad Khalifa, Ph.D. (3:07 Straightforward and multiple-meaning or allegorical verses; beware for confusion)
Sura 4, Women (Al-Nesã’) Quran The Final Testament, translated by Rashad Khalifa, Ph.D. (4:88 God sent some people astray, away from God; you can never undo what God did)
Sura 5, The Feast (Al-Mã’edah) Quran The Final Testament, translated by Rashad Khalifa, Ph.D. (5:48 God willed the different faiths, stick to your own, act righteous; all will return to God)
Sura 5, The Feast (Al-Mã’edah) Quran The Final Testament, translated by Rashad Khalifa, Ph.D. (5:51 beware who you choose as your alley)
@stvdvRF
 
Last edited:

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
If people had any effort to stick to what is clear proofs and insights in Quran and Sunnah, and not follow ambiguities of what their scholars emphasize on and teach, everything, justice, the whole world at peace, all that would've been achieved from my point of view.

3:7 is super important.
Yes I fully agree

Koran verse 3:7 is very important to me (My Master pointed that one out to me)

I rather ask God to explain the verses to me, than ask a scholar (nowadays in Kali Yuga there are not so many satwic scholars, better be careful)
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
To me, this reads a bit like if someone turns away from Allah, don't try to bring them back because Allah made them turn so it's useless for you to try. Apostate only want to convince you that Allah's message is false and that you should disbelieve like them. Don't make friends with them. Let them flee or leave if they want to, but if they try to return then kill them all with no quarter given. Take no poisoners or slaves, but be smart about it a little bit. If they sought help from an ally of yours, leave them be and live amongst those allies in peace. If they come back in repentance, then leave them be to. If they want to be your allies against other enemies of yours, then make peace with them and use them as such. If they find a home in amongst your enemies and try to cause you harm then feel free to kill them all.

It does indeed doesn't sanction the killing of apostates nor give free reign to kill them all, but it does seem to sanction their exile and makes it very apparent that those apostate aren't to be liked in general. It also seem to show that apostasy can be forgiven if sincere and that you must give them a chance if demand from pardon comes from them.

I would not say is sanctions exile in normal circumstances. But they can't take their chances hanging around at close quarters while their at war for them to attack them while they might be faking their commitment to peace. So if they withdraw from them, withhold their hands from fighting, and offer peace... this seems noble especially since for all they know, they might be faking their offer of peace.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Yes I fully agree

Koran verse 3:7 is very important to me (My Master pointed that one out to me)

I rather ask God to explain the verses to me, than ask a scholar (nowadays in Kali Yuga there are not so many satwic scholars, better be careful)

I think there is nothing wrong with asking multiple scholars as long we seek to understand and not blindly follow. Imams (a) said beware of leadership and marching behind men. The companion being told this by Imam Baqir (a) replied, "I understand leadership (belonging to you) but everything I've learned is through marching behind men", the Imam (a) replied, "it's not what you think (that I meant), beware of listening to a person not appointed by God and then accepting everything they say"
 

Shakeel

Well-Known Member
The verses show:

(1) They can if they go a people who do not fight them
(2) Even if they go a people fighting them, if they promise to withhold their hands and not fight the Muslims, and offer peace, they are to be allowed to go and return.

The turning back is a public act of apostasy, but Quran doesn't say to kill them all, it says only to kill those who do not offer peace and won't withhold their hands from fighting, and only these did God give clear authority to the believers to kill them.
This is essentially about hypocrites, not all apostates and certainly not a universal rule on how to deal with apostates. Many people were killed at the conquest of Macca and one was nearly killed even when he came to offer peace.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
This is essentially about hypocrites, not all apostates and certainly not a universal rule on how to deal with apostates.

This about hypocrites if they apostate and hence, possibly would go fight the Muslims. As they already turned away inwardly (they hypocrites), this about them leaving the religion. It's only because of this possibility of faking peace and fighting Muslims, they weren't allowed to hang around (because they polytheists were at war with Muslims). It said, however, if they are returning to a people with an alliance, then let them go. As for those returning to people who fight you, only in the case, they don't offer peace and withholding their hands and withdrawing from you, can you kill them. It didn't allow it if they offered peace, withdraw, and don't fight. It's clear.
 

Shakeel

Well-Known Member
This about hypocrites if they apostate and hence, possibly would go fight the Muslims. As they already turned away inwardly (they hypocrites), this about them leaving the religion. It's only because of this possibility of faking peace and fighting Muslims, they weren't allowed to hang around (because they polytheists were at war with Muslims). It said, however, if they are returning to a people with an alliance, then let them go. As for those returning to people who fight you, only in the case, they don't offer peace and withholding their hands and withdrawing from you, can you kill them. It didn't allow it if they offered peace, withdraw, and don't fight. It's clear.
Really it doesn't even matter, because this is not why apostate are killed. It's in both the hadiths of sunni Muslims and the Shia Muslims.

I'm surprised you admit to so many things the shias would probably consider you an apostate for.

Are you ever going to tell us who you follow? You might say no one, but you quote an awful lot of hadiths so...that would be a lie.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Really it doesn't even matter, because this is not why apostate are killed. It's in both the hadiths of sunni Muslims and the Shia Muslims.

I'm surprised you admit to so many things the shias would probably consider you an apostate for.

Are you ever going to tell us who you follow? You might say no one, but you quote an awful lot of hadiths so...that would be a lie.

Following hadiths instead of Quran is non-sensical.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
I don't see an allowance for apostates / heathens who defend
themselves against attack by Muslims. Would this allow
Muslims to conquer others, & kill them for resisting?

You are told not to be the aggressor, and you only fight against the aggressor.
 

firedragon

Veteran Member
To me, this reads a bit like if someone turns away from Allah, don't try to bring them back because Allah made them turn so it's useless for you to try. Apostate only want to convince you that Allah's message is false and that you should disbelieve like them. Don't make friends with them. Let them flee or leave if they want to, but if they try to return then kill them all with no quarter given. Take no poisoners or slaves, but be smart about it a little bit. If they sought help from an ally of yours, leave them be and live amongst those allies in peace. If they come back in repentance, then leave them be to. If they want to be your allies against other enemies of yours, then make peace with them and use them as such. If they find a home in amongst your enemies and try to cause you harm then feel free to kill them all.

It does indeed doesn't sanction the killing of apostates nor give free reign to kill them all, but it does seem to sanction their exile and makes it very apparent that those apostate aren't to be liked in general. It also seem to show that apostasy can be forgiven if sincere and that you must give them a chance if demand from pardon comes from them.

Which exact verse are you referring to about "apostates"?
 

danieldemol

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Appealing to authority? Or is it appealing to minority? Or is it appealing to majority?

Anyway all three are logical fallacies.
I was appealing to the evidence. If someone else does not interpret the Quran the way you do that is evidence that they understand it differently to you.

So no logical fallacy has been committed.

In my opinion.
 
Top