-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
JW's Jesus is Archangel Michael?
- Thread starter Yoshua
- Start date
djhwoodwerks
Well-Known Member
So you're saying that "YOU" know Jesus knew He was Michael before He came to earth?
djhwoodwerks
Well-Known Member
I know it doesn't make sense to you because you are like the JW's and deny Jesus.
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
As the posts above prove, you were the one that brought judgment into the question. And now like a chameleon you seek to accuse me of your mistake.
But then you will be however the spirit which drives you moves you to be.
Last edited:
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
if it suites your intelligence to believe that, guess what, you don't need my permission.
Michael was not yet the Son of man. He had not yet been given authority as the last Adam .
There is a distinct difference in what Michael had permission of God to do before he became the last Adam, and what he came to have permission of God to do after he became the last Adam.
Last edited:
Oh please do not show yourself a hypocrite. You said, " God exalts the faithful not so they can play God, but so that they can serve the needs of others."
I think you do what you say they should not do which is "But once men have been for whatever reason manipulated into a place where they espouse falsities they also go to an unsteady man's length in trying to defend those falsities." Do you? That is the question. Do you defend faslities?
I asked him if he espouses falsehoods. I say he does. He should answer that he doesn't I should think.
Please tell us HOW Jesus AND Michael show up at the same time?
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
If it satisfies you to think that then you don't need any approval from me to think it.
I think you must not criticize others for what you also do. Ya know?
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
If you mean as two separate individuals you will first need to present your proof that it ever happened.
(By the way, I may have to step out to go somewhere else again. When I leave I have no means of continuing to answer and must wait until I return, even to know what else has been posted. So don't let your imagination run wild when that happens.)
Revelation 1:10...... Revelation 19:11...... Daniel 12:1 ...... How is that time described in Daniel not the great tribulation? So Jesus comes to judge and to deliver the faithful from the great tribulation and so does Michael. Please tell me how I got this wrong.
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
Like I said, i don't care what you think. Insofar as i am concerned you may think whatever you wish to think.
So? Why are you here?
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
Now explain the mechanics in detail as to how those verses translate into what you claim. For I do not see that they in any way do.
Who are many Christians dependant on? Jesus or Michael? Both?
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
I was posting back and forth to someone else when you butted in with your shear non-sense.
Mountain_Climber
Active Member
Stop avoiding my question in post 455.
Jesus comes to save his people. Michael does also. The JWs teach that the prophesy about Michael happens in the last days. Do they? Do you?
LOL. What are you DOING here? Do you think you might be drawing people to Jesus Christ?