Well I guess I should thank you for those concessions......but I really have to ask if you know anything about blood transfusions medically speaking, that address the actual downside of that procedure?
I will address this to
@outlawState as well. Would it surprise you to know, for example, that more people die
after receiving a blood transfusion (or multiple transfusions) than those who ever die from refusing them? Would it surprise you to know that Jehovah's Witnesses will happily use alternative measures that make transfusions unnecessary? Did you know that safer alternatives even exist?
Would it surprise you to know that transfusions carry greater risk of death and morbidity than any other procedure used in medicine and that hospitals dedicated to non-blood alternative medicine have sprung up all over the world because of the positive outcomes experienced with JW's?
The following short video was put up on the Australian Government website as a warning about the overuse of this dangerous procedure. In our experience, if a person dies because they rejected a blood transfusion, in all probability, they would have died regardless. Blood is no guarantee of saving a life.
Patient Blood Management (PBM) | National Blood Authority
Please consider the evidence for yourself and then tell us if we are not wise for rejecting this procedure which is of course, based on the Bible's prohibition on blood. (Acts 15:28-29)
We can't forget that blood is a multi-million dollar industry and those who profit from it are not going to let that cash cow go without a fight. Do you think they care about how dangerous it is? Who blames them if someone dies? Do you think they are going to let doctors who can't be bothered to do their own research, see anything wrong with it. Lazy, out of date doctors are a blight on the medical system.