TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
If they disappeared then would ideology just pick up where they left off? that's the more important question?
Even if that were the case, I don't consider that a good argument to not deal with it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If they disappeared then would ideology just pick up where they left off? that's the more important question?
I'm sure there are ideologies that supported sexism and homophobia and anti democratic before religions came around.
I've heard a lot of people on here say that religion is the source of a lot of the problems in the world. Even if there were no religions ideology would be left and problems would still persist, no?
ie. If Christianity never emerged homosexuals still would've been persecuted through ideologies.
In that case they would be rejecting the science that debunked racialism
Religions will always be what people interpret them to be.In my experience, religion is not the source of problems. People's interpretation of their religion and their judgments and actions based on these interpretations is the problem.
The problem comes down to people, not religion.
Surely not everybody tolerated it so it's hard to say if their ancestors were even more tolerant or not.
I've heard a lot of people on here say that religion is the source of a lot of the problems in the world. Even if there were no religions ideology would be left and problems would still persist, no?
ie. If Christianity never emerged homosexuals still would've been persecuted through ideologies.
I've heard a lot of people on here say that religion is the source of a lot of the problems in the world. Even if there were no religions ideology would be left and problems would still persist, no?
ie. If Christianity never emerged homosexuals still would've been persecuted through ideologies.
You said it three times. relax. I'm looking for the source of the problemIt's irrelevant and a red herring.
Problems that exist without religion, is not an argument to ignore problems that exist due to religion.
What are you talking about? I said religions. I didn't say anything about atheism. Oh do you mean that it's a religion? Calm downI disagree. Atheists have no major problems. Atheist friends never struggle with violence, racism, despair, addictions. Atheism has solved and will continue to solve all the world's major and minor problems.
You said it three times
I'm looking for the source of the problem
Yeah but that doesn't answer my questionReligion is only one possibility to exploit human stupidity. Ideology, patriotism or person cults can have the same effect. Religion just did it most successful. It not only exploits stupidity but promotes it at the same time,
Where did they get those ideas to put in the bookWell, you keep repeating it.
A book perceived to be from an all powerfull being, calling gays an abomination and commanding to have them killed, certainly counts as a source for homophobia, wouldn't you say? Especially when people believe it and bring that forward as being the reason and evidence for their homophobia.
Never repeated itWell, you keep repeating it.
A book perceived to be from an all powerfull being, calling gays an abomination and commanding to have them killed, certainly counts as a source for homophobia, wouldn't you say? Especially when people believe it and bring that forward as being the reason and evidence for their homophobia.
They would've still been persecuted through ideologies if Christianity had never been bornWell, you keep repeating it.
A book perceived to be from an all powerfull being, calling gays an abomination and commanding to have them killed, certainly counts as a source for homophobia, wouldn't you say? Especially when people believe it and bring that forward as being the reason and evidence for their homophobia.
Fixed that for you.
"per se
"by himself, herself, or itself," 1570s, Latin, literally "by itself;" from per (see per) + se (see se-). The Latin phrase translates Greek kath auto (Aristotle)." - per se | Origin and meaning of phrase per se by Online Etymology Dictionary
by replacement grammar nazi in absence of @Revoltingest
heyo
Religion isn’t the source. Religion is the vehicle. Power is the source. People abuse religion to gain power.I've heard a lot of people on here say that religion is the source of a lot of the problems in the world. Even if there were no religions ideology would be left and problems would still persist, no?
ie. If Christianity never emerged homosexuals still would've been persecuted through ideologies.
It started with the Ubiquitous spread of the “High Five” and our aversion to it.Guess we'll never know The beginnings of homophobia unfortunately