Monk Of Reason
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
The issue of homosexuality isn't that it should be stamped out or it should be inhibited.
The fact of the matter is that homosexuals exist. It is from birth. We even know why.
Scientists May Have Finally Unlocked Puzzle of Why People Are Gay - US News
So now that we know it is not an option to simply "not be gay" what are we to do? There have been arguments sent around that homosexuality is innately harmful. There has never been a successful argument to provide this. Homophobia in the form of personal or public pressures have been linked in causes of sexual misconduct and dangerous sexual practices.
There has been proven methods to reduce the harm and potentially make it no more harmful than heterosexual sex. (in fact female to female intercourse is already far safer than male to female intercourse has ever been) This method is through public acceptance of these sexual orientations and proper educations on safe sex for all orientations.
If the goal is to reduce "harm" caused by the homosexual community it only makes sense to give them the tools they need both sociologically and educationally to be successful and safe.
And onto marriage itself it is simply a matter of dignity. No one is arguing in favor of "just because" or "it feels good". It is a matter of human dignity and dignity is something we have proven over and over to be important. The dignity of women, religious minorities and ethnic minorities have all been fought for. Now we are slowly getting to the point where sexual orientation is obtaining the same dignity across the board.
Thoughts for or against?
The fact of the matter is that homosexuals exist. It is from birth. We even know why.
Scientists May Have Finally Unlocked Puzzle of Why People Are Gay - US News
So now that we know it is not an option to simply "not be gay" what are we to do? There have been arguments sent around that homosexuality is innately harmful. There has never been a successful argument to provide this. Homophobia in the form of personal or public pressures have been linked in causes of sexual misconduct and dangerous sexual practices.
There has been proven methods to reduce the harm and potentially make it no more harmful than heterosexual sex. (in fact female to female intercourse is already far safer than male to female intercourse has ever been) This method is through public acceptance of these sexual orientations and proper educations on safe sex for all orientations.
If the goal is to reduce "harm" caused by the homosexual community it only makes sense to give them the tools they need both sociologically and educationally to be successful and safe.
And onto marriage itself it is simply a matter of dignity. No one is arguing in favor of "just because" or "it feels good". It is a matter of human dignity and dignity is something we have proven over and over to be important. The dignity of women, religious minorities and ethnic minorities have all been fought for. Now we are slowly getting to the point where sexual orientation is obtaining the same dignity across the board.
Thoughts for or against?