Gambit
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually that quote should be the other way around, "I am, therefore I think".I think, therefore, I am.
famous quote.
I think....I was quoting Descartes.Actually that quote should be the other way around, "I am, therefore I think".
Yes it was from Descartes, and he was right on one level, but not on the ultimate.I think....I was quoting Descartes.
I suppose we could digress a little to consider that effect for the First.
(that would be God)
Did you thinking become before you were, or the other way around ?.I voted 'axiomatic', I think therefor I am.
I voted axiomatic. That said, my thinking transcends time and space therefore the question is moot.Did you thinking become before you were, or the other way around ?.
Who is the thinker that is thinking ?.I voted axiomatic. That said, my thinking transcends time and space therefore the question is moot.
The entity that is me.Who is the thinker that is thinking ?.
I can understand the entity, but I cannot understand the me, you is the me ?.The entity that is me.
I am a personality energy essence, an entity. Sue me.I can understand the entity, but I cannot understand the me, you is the me ?.
But where and how did you acquire your so called personality ?.I am a personality energy essence, an entity. Sue me.
The same way all beings do, presumably.But where and how did you acquire your so called personality ?.
Yes but where did you acquire it from, forget everyone else.The same way all beings do, presumably.
Through a process I have been involved in for a very, very long time.Yes but where did you acquire it from, forget everyone else.
Yes and this process is called conditioning and programming, do you realize that ?.Through a process I have been involved in for a very, very long time.