While I listen to NPR only on & off during my day, I've noticed
a pattern in their coverage of the US vs Iran hostilities.....
They give a history of conflicts between the 2 warring parties,
but mention only incidents which make Iran look the aggressor.
I've yet to hear about the 1953 coup, the proxy war using Iraq,
the Stuxnet attack, etc.
Is this mere ignorance of our provocations (lack of due diligence),
or do they actually support Trump's belligerence? Criticism of him
has been muted when covering this matter, eg, not the usual dwelling
on calling him a liar or racist.
Why?
Is the sentiment anti-Islam, anti-Iran, pro-Israel, or a combination?
Or do the see nascent war as good foreign policy?
a pattern in their coverage of the US vs Iran hostilities.....
They give a history of conflicts between the 2 warring parties,
but mention only incidents which make Iran look the aggressor.
I've yet to hear about the 1953 coup, the proxy war using Iraq,
the Stuxnet attack, etc.
Is this mere ignorance of our provocations (lack of due diligence),
or do they actually support Trump's belligerence? Criticism of him
has been muted when covering this matter, eg, not the usual dwelling
on calling him a liar or racist.
Why?
Is the sentiment anti-Islam, anti-Iran, pro-Israel, or a combination?
Or do the see nascent war as good foreign policy?