Some may commit minor sins. Are there any prophets who are free of even minor sins?
No, I don't think so,they are not free to commit minor sins.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Some may commit minor sins. Are there any prophets who are free of even minor sins?
Yes ,The Quran glorify ALL the prophets.I have heard arguments from Muslim apologists that one of the reasons the Quran is superior to the Bible is that it (the Quran) restores the purity of past prophets by depicting them as free of sins they say are found in the Biblical narratives. Can anyone speak to this and how it relates to the Islamic ideas of sinlessness and prophethood? If the Biblical narrative of David were taken as true, would it invalidate him from being a prophet by Islamic standards?
Yes ,The Quran glorify ALL the prophets.
David and Moses and Jesus ....etc peace be on them, all are our prophets.
Here an answer from a Sheikh :
Question : "I have been told by someone claiming to be a Muslim that all God's prophets, including Mohammed, were without sin, (perfect), never requiring forgiveness. Is this a view held officially by Islam as a whole?"
Answer : “The ummah (Muslim nation) is agreed that the Messengers are infallible in carrying out their mission – they do not forget anything that Allaah has revealed to them except with regard to matters that have been abrogated.
If anything is concealed or changed, then the punishment of Allaah will befall the one who is guilty of doing these things, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
‘And if he [Muhammad (pbhu)] had forged a false saying concerning Us [Allaah], We surely would have seized him by his right hand (or with power and might), and then certainly should have cut off his life artery (aorta).’
When it comes to the idea of the Prophets committing major sins (kabaa’ir), Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said (in al-Fataawaa, 4/319): “…The belief that the Prophets are free of major sins, but not of minor sins, is the opinion of the majority of Islamic scholars and of all (Muslim) groups… It is the opinion of most mufassireen (commentators on the Qur’an), scholars of hadeeth and fuqaha’ (jurists).”
“They are infallible in conveying the commands and message of Allaah, but they are not infallible in any other regard. They may make mistakes, forget things, or commit minor sins – according to the most well-known opinion (of the scholars) – but they will not be approved for these mistakes.”
https://islamqa.info/en/1684
I have heard arguments from Muslim apologists that one of the reasons the Quran is superior to the Bible is that it (the Quran) restores the purity of past prophets by depicting them as free of sins they say are found in the Biblical narratives. Can anyone speak to this and how it relates to the Islamic ideas of sinlessness and prophethood? If the Biblical narrative of David were taken as true, would it invalidate him from being a prophet by Islamic standards?
Sorry von,I don't know about the picture (reputation) of David (pbuh) in Bible.Prophets such as David and Moses are depicted in different ways in the Bible and the Quran. Is the picture of David from the Bible that of a sinless prophet? How about from the Quran? And, what makes the difference?
Would it be correct to say that Muhammad never disobeyed Allah in any of his commands?
Did any prophets ever disobey Allah, or did they only commit minor sins by accident?
In reading the link, I am trying to find the theme of what all is listed. If you define sin as more than disobeying Allah, how would you sum up what the "more" is?
I liked this very much but we Baha'is believe Prophet Muhammad, according to the Quran's statements as being an Example to humanity was sinless in every respect both minor and major and committed no wrong and made no mistakes. He was a Perfect Man as well as a Prophet of God.
I personnally don't know what to think, as i don't know if Jesus and his mother are also totally sinless. I think it's possible but not 100% sure.
What do you guys do with the verses where Moses is punished, if you believed him to be sinless?We believe all the Teachers and Educators of the major religions were sinless also.
Moses... We believe They were Perfect Beings and sinless...
What do you guys do with the verses where Moses is punished, if you believed him to be sinless?
I see in that article it addresses Num. 20 but skips the passage where Moses hits the rock, not in compliance with G-d's command (as he was told to speak to it) and in return G-d punishes him to not be able to bring the Jews into Israel. So you have Moses not listening to G-d's command and directly being punished for it.Our interpretation of that verse is that the rebuke was addressed through Moses to His followers.
This link explains that rebuke as well as rebukes to other Prophets.
http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/ab/SAQ/saq-44.html
"the addresses in the form of reproach which are in the Holy Books, though apparently directed to the Prophets—that is to say, to the Manifestations of God—in reality are intended for the people. This will become evident and clear to you when you have diligently examined the Holy Books." Some Answered Questions
I see in that article it addresses Num. 20 but skips the passage where Moses hits the rock, not in compliance with G-d's command (as he was told to speak to it) and in return G-d punishes him to not be able to bring the Jews into Israel. So you have Moses not listening to G-d's command and directly being punished for it.
When referring to chastisement, the word שבט is used such as in Proverbs 22:15, 23:13 and also in your reference of Isaiah. In the passage here in Numbers a different word meaning staff is used (שבט). And frankly, considering the context, it wouldn't make any sense to understand it your way. The Israelites are asking for water. Moses is meant to do a repeat performance of getting the water out of the rock. This isn't a metaphor or parable, so its really difficult to understand where you are coming from.Note in the Bible it says Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my church, likening a true believer to a rock, firm and steadfast.
With Moses He was told to speak to the rock (the believers) but as speaking to them did not get a response Moses had to chastise them with the rod of his mouth whereby again the followers are being rebuked through Moses for having to be chastised before they would obey.
In another passage below see how it describes rebuking and chastising as striking with a rod?
Isaiah 11.4
And He will strike the earth with the rod of His mouth,
When referring to chastisement, the word שבט is used such as in Proverbs 22:15, 23:13 and also in your reference of Isaiah. In the passage here in Numbers a different word meaning staff is used (שבט). And frankly, considering the context, it wouldn't make any sense to understand it your way. The Israelites are asking for water. Moses is meant to do a repeat performance of getting the water out of the rock. This isn't a metaphor or parable, so its really difficult to understand where you are coming from.
Sorry von,I don't know about the picture (reputation) of David (pbuh) in Bible.
can you enlight me,how the Bible show David(pbuh) in this case ?
Anyway,David (pbuh) and all the prophet were sinless in Quran,that's what suppose to be the messanger of God.
btw We Muslims believe Bible is corrupted by humans hands.
Prophet Muhammad PBUH was not sinless.
Because Allah swt said in Quran :
That He may forgive ur sins from past and future.
However Prophet PBUH was protected from major sins.