Is it sin?

[DNB]

Ah, so you don't deny my speculation about your innate desires and motives? Very revealing.

I was always wary of you!

 

[Samael_Khan]

I was always wary of you!

I hit the nail on the head?

 

[DNB]

I hit the nail on the head?

Who's head?

 

[Samael_Khan]

Who's head?

Unaware of the idiom's origin?

 

[DNB]

Unaware of the idiom's origin?

Cracks are still showing.

 

[kjw47]

No I don't see that at all, just some claims that were so vague anyone could make them with a better than average chance they'd come true at some point, and other claims that clearly have not come true. As I've explained now several times, even someone could show unequivocally that an extremely accurate and unlikely claim later came true exactly as described, all you would have is inexplicable event. To claim otherwise is an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy, and ipso fact irrational.

A 7 headed beast with 10 horns-In Daniel the key to solving revelation--a horn = a kingdom--10 kingdoms represent a place where kingdoms gather. In Daniel--, 4 world powers all given the mark of a beast--Then the roman empire=5--the British empire = 6-) the 2 horned beast(2 kingdoms working together as the final world power.- = the 7th and final.
it says at rev 13--- The 2 horned beast excercises all authority in the world of the 7 headed beast=Resolutions.
Cannot buy or sell unless receiving the mark of the beast= sanctions
Makes fire come down out of the heavens= bombs-missiles
The mark of the beast= peace and security-That is made to look good to the mortal heart thus in a sense they are mislead to worship that in a sense, not actual worship-just means putting hope into that. That man can get them out of the mess in this world. The 2 horned beast( 2 kingdoms working together= Eagle and Lion)
Mexico has now sent a statue that is placed outside of the United nations-It looks just like the description of Rev 13:2-In its inscription--peace and security-- At 1Thess 5:3 warns all-Whenever they are saying=peace and security, sudden destruction will be upon them--
Also in revelation it describes the beast with 10 horns--- The one that was ( league of nations) is not ( done away with after ww2=death stroke) and yet is ( united nations rose up= death stroke got healed) --very soon the nations will hand their power over to this beast for 1 hour( short time)( it says God will put it into their hearts to do this) to rid the world of the whore of Babylon( worldwide false religions) thus the tribulation begins-the locking of the door of the ark perse.

See the whole world has been watching it occur. Those in darkness cannot see. the door remains open but not for long.

 

[Samael_Khan]

Cracks are still showing.

Well, what I was going to say was that the term refers to hitting the nails head, not the head on which the nail has been hit into. But anyway....

You really don't like being dealt your own medicine back at you, do you? And you probably don't realize the irony in what I said a few posts ago, by assuming your character based off of one set of your actions alone.

 

[DNB]

Well, what I was going to say was that the term refers to hitting the nails head, not the head on which the nail has been hit into. But anyway....

You really don't like being dealt your own medicine back at you, do you? And you probably don't realize the irony in what I said a few posts ago, by assuming your character based off of one set of your actions alone.

My humour was a little elusive. I know exactly what 'hitting the hammer on the head means', but considering how far off you were on your conclusion, I inferred that you hit the hammer on your own head, and not the nail.

 

[Samael_Khan]

My humour was a little elusive. I know exactly what 'hitting the hammer on the head means', but considering how far off you were on your conclusion, I inferred that you hit the hammer on your own head, and not the nail.

Fair enough.

So then the conclusion is far off.

So you would then be in the same position that a promiscuous person would be in when you state your far off conclusions about their character. I am sure that you could relate to them in that way.

 

[DNB]

Fair enough.

So then the conclusion is far off.

So you would then be in the same position that a promiscuous person would be in when you state your far off conclusions about their character. I am sure that you could relate to them in that way.

Promiscuous people have depraved characters, they are licentious and hedonistic. In order to build their character and become secure, competent and helpful people, they need to desist from their former ways and become wholesome and spiritually guided people.

 

[Samael_Khan]

Promiscuous people have depraved characters, they are licentious and hedonistic. In order to build their character and become secure, competent and helpful people, they need to desist from their former ways and become wholesome and spiritually guided people.

By saying that they are not secure, competent and helpful people is a far off conclusion about their character.

 

[Sheldon]

Promiscuous people have depraved characters, they are licentious and hedonistic.

That's just your opinion, and who an adult has sex with is their own business, as long as no one is harmed. Homophobic bigotry is far more depraved behaviour, as it is demonstrably pernicious.

In order to build their character and become secure, competent and helpful people, they need to desist from their former ways and become wholesome and spiritually guided people.

Nonsense, how sexually frustrated must people be to have to lecture others on their sex lives.

 

[DNB]

By saying that they are not secure, competent and helpful people is a far off conclusion about their character.

For a self-proclaimed spiritualist, you lack a great deal spiritual awareness?

 

[DNB]

That's just your opinion, and who an adult has sex with is their own business, as long as no one is harmed.

Define harm?

Homophobic bigotry is far more depraved behaviour, as it is demonstrably pernicious.

Homosexual advocation is demonstrably licentious and odious. 'Sex sells' , and the fact that there are countless baby mammas and STDs out there, is because of people like you who can't discern the difference between right from wrong, decency and shame, love and lust, respect and objectification.

Nonsense, how sexually frustrated must people be to have to lecture others on their sex lives.

How shallow and depraved must one be in order to not appreciate the sentiments, or heed the warnings?

 

[Samael_Khan]

For a self-proclaimed spiritualist, you lack a great deal spiritual awareness?

Sorry, I have never claimed to be a spiritualist, as I don't claim to serve as an intermediary between the living and the dead.

Spiritualist - definition of spiritualist by The Free Dictionary

I admit that I lack spiritual awareness, hence why I say that I am EXPLORING spirituality. You seem to live in your own bubble and are ignorant of the different concepts of spirituality.

For someone who makes a lot of definite claims, you sure prove yourself to be stubbornly ignorant about other people's views or the broad concepts concerning the topics you discuss.

 

[DNB]

Sorry, I have never claimed to be a spiritualist, as I don't claim to serve as an intermediary between the living and the dead.

Spiritualist - definition of spiritualist by The Free Dictionary

I admit that I lack spiritual awareness, hence why I say that I am EXPLORING spirituality. You seem to live in your own bubble and are ignorant of the different concepts of spirituality.

For someone who makes a lot of definite claims, you sure prove yourself to be stubbornly ignorant about other people's views or the broad concepts concerning the topics you discuss.

You seem to be entirely ignorant of what you yourself either believe, or are exploring. Did you not even read your own post on the definition, as in point 2?

 

[Samael_Khan]

You seem to be entirely ignorant of what you yourself either believe, or are exploring. Did you not even read your own post on the definition, as in point 2?

That was the definition of spiritualism, if you didn't notice that. Below that the noun spiritualist is said to mean "someone who serves as an intermediary between the living and the dead".

Another definition:

spiritualist
[ˈspɪrɪtʃ(ʊ)əlɪst, ˈspɪrɪtjʊəlɪst]
NOUN

1. a person who believes that the spirits of the dead can communicate with living people.
   "he became an ardent spiritualist, attending seances and insisting on their authenticity"
2. philosophy
   an advocate of the doctrine that the spirit exists as distinct from matter, or that spirit is the only reality.
   "a non-denominational spiritualist"

Either way, I am none of the above.

Now here is the definition of "Spiritual" which is apart of my profile:

spiritual
[ˈspɪrɪtʃʊəl, ˈspɪrɪtjʊəl]
ADJECTIVE

1. relating to or affecting the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things.
   "I'm responsible for his spiritual welfare"
   synonyms:
   non-material · inner · psychic · psychical · psychological · incorporeal ·
   [more]
2. relating to religion or religious belief.
   "the country's spiritual leader"
   synonyms:
   religious · sacred · divine · holy · non-secular · church · churchly · ecclesiastic · devotional

This is more accurate to what I am exploring. I am not committed to any.

Now when it comes to using the physical realm to access the spiritual, such as with sex, see the below:

Kama Sutra: Insights on Sex and Spirituality – The Chopra Foundation
Tantra: Sex and Spirituality - Somananda.org

And, as usual, you aren't actually properly replying to most of my points, which is very revealing in itself.

 

[Sheldon]

That's just your opinion, and who an adult has sex with is their own business, as long as no one is harmed. Homophobic bigotry is far more depraved behaviour, as it is demonstrably pernicious.

Define harm?

noun

1. physical injury, especially that which is deliberately inflicted.

For the sake of clarity I would consider severe emotional distress inflicted deliberately on someone just because of who they are, to be a pernicious act.

Homosexual advocation

No one is advoating homsexuality, it exists and is a perfectly natural variant of adult human sexual desire, and it harms no one.

is demonstrably licentious and odious.

I think you ought to look up licentious, but homosexuality is a type of adult sexual desire, thus it is no more licentious than heterosexuality or bisexuality. If it were odious people would not find their own gender attractive, thus you mean you find it odious, so what? I find many things odious, many of your posts for example, but would not deny others the right to a belief or to express it, or an action or practice on that basis alone, as that would be an absurd piece of bigotry.

'Sex sells' , and the fact that there are countless baby mammas and STDs out there, is because of people like you who can't discern the difference between right from wrong, decency and shame, love and lust, respect and objectification.

People like me? You know precisely nothing about me until I tell you, so that is a typically asinine piece of bigoted hyperbole. FWIW I have never fathered a child, or had an STD, and I happen to have been born a heterosexual, and so I had no more say in that than gay people have over who they find sexually attractive, so your ignorant bigotry is very wide of the mark. The difference between us is not that I am less moral than you, though we clearly have very different and equally subjective views on what is moral. The difference is that unlike you, I don't tell others how to live their lives based on my own sexual proclivities. If you think homophobic bigotry is in any way respectful or decent, then that is very edifying. Your ad hominem yet again speaks for itself, especially since you are making things up and simply assigning them to me.

How shallow and depraved must one be in order to not appreciate the sentiments, or heed the warnings?

What sentiments, what warnings? All you have espoused is intolerance and bigotry, and sexual repression that you want to dictate and force onto others. No one is obliged to live their lives according to how you think they should, and given how intolerant you are that is indeed a blessing.

 

[EtuMalku]

It is normal to want to watch p-graphy.
However, it is not normal to watch p-graphy.
The unrealized desire to watch semi-naked ladies is the growing mental pain.
So, get to love your pain and dissatisfaction. Life after the Original Sin is like one huge pain.


The medicine, the doctors tell, that the healthy sexual act produces the good chemical pattern in the brain. However, the watching p-phy produces the poison in the brain.

About another theme:

It is normal to fear death, even with terrible fear (like Jesus Christ did before Crucifixion). But it is not normal to die: not normal to die physically, and not normal to die mentally.

About another theme:
"The luck is one of the God's names. Because to be lucky is good. And all good notions are the God's names: Love, Justice, Way, Truth, Police, etc. "

• I don't see why it is 'normal' to want to watch pornography. The majority of females I know, have absolutely no desire to watch that.
• Watching anything is certainly normal. It's the engaging of your sight with something you have decided to engage with.
• I don't accept the idea of Original Sin, so I'm not coming from that direction.
• Referring to my first statement, certain portrayals of porn is certainly deviant and psychologically unhealthy, while other portrayals would be considered quite acceptable to the psyche.

• Death simply does not exist. It is an illusion that arises in the minds of people because people identify themselves with their bodies. They believe that the body is going to perish, sooner or later, thinking that their consciousness will disappear too. Consciousness exists outside of the constraints of time and space. It is able to be anywhere: in the human body and outside of it. The center of self separates from the physical body when that body ceases to be serviceable to it.

 

[Sheldon]

Consciousness exists outside of the constraints of time and space. It is able to be anywhere: in the human body and outside of it.

Yeah I'm going to have to disbelieve that unless you can demonstrate something beyond your bare unevidenced assertion?