Wandered Off
Sporadic Driveby Member
If a being is outside of time, wouldn't that mean it would have to be completely static (unchanging, inactive)? Actions, including interactions with humans or others "in time" are defined as having a beginning and an ending. The concept of "beginning" and "ending" have no referent outside of time, so how can a being outside of time act or be anything other than static? Does a being have to "enter time" to act? Is the being changed by such action, which would work against stasis? What would "initiate" any will or thought for a being outside of time? We think of thought (ooh, loopy!) in a temporal context with a beginning and end. What kind of thought or communication or any other action can exist outside of time?
All discrete actions, even "mental actions" (thought), as far as I know, have beginnings and endings. They way we can tell whether action is occurring or has occurred is by observing change. Time and change are inextricably intertwined.
In deference to our atheist friends, we can leave God out of it for just a moment to make it relevant: Can change exist outside of time?
I think God (or any being who will act in any way) must have time as a conduit for action. It may well be that time itself has no decaying effect on God or the 'spirit world'. Still, I think time is necessary for actions, as all actions entail a beginning and end - which have no referent outside of time. That's my beef with the 'outside of time' concept.
One of the biggest reasons for the outside of time notion in the first place is the thought that God created everything, including time, so God cannot be bound by time, as that would somehow be demeaning or would compromise omnipotence. I dont see how, though.
Maybe the real argument isnt about whether God exists outside of time but whether time is linear for God as it is for us.
Is this is just one of those "You would never understand so shut up" things?
All discrete actions, even "mental actions" (thought), as far as I know, have beginnings and endings. They way we can tell whether action is occurring or has occurred is by observing change. Time and change are inextricably intertwined.
In deference to our atheist friends, we can leave God out of it for just a moment to make it relevant: Can change exist outside of time?
I think God (or any being who will act in any way) must have time as a conduit for action. It may well be that time itself has no decaying effect on God or the 'spirit world'. Still, I think time is necessary for actions, as all actions entail a beginning and end - which have no referent outside of time. That's my beef with the 'outside of time' concept.
One of the biggest reasons for the outside of time notion in the first place is the thought that God created everything, including time, so God cannot be bound by time, as that would somehow be demeaning or would compromise omnipotence. I dont see how, though.
Maybe the real argument isnt about whether God exists outside of time but whether time is linear for God as it is for us.
Is this is just one of those "You would never understand so shut up" things?