Today's BBC: Greenhouse gas concentrations break records
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Assuming private spacefare also lowered the cost to Mars to 1/10 we are still at $200,000 per kg. Even at 1/100 or 1/1000 the money would be still more effective on Earth."Between 1970 and 2000, the cost to launch a kilogram to space remained fairly steady, with an average of US$18,500 per kilogram. When the space shuttle was in operation, it could launch a payload of 27,500 kilograms for $1.5 billion, or $54,500 per kilogram. For a SpaceX Falcon 9, the rocket used to access the ISS, the cost is just $2,720 per kilogram."
How SpaceX lowered costs and reduced barriers to space
Obvious troll is obvious.And yet you find more than one thread to post your denial on. Not looking too good when you claim not to be debating and then search out debates.
Cool gaslighting attempt *eyeroll*LOL
That's not what happened at all.
Re-read it if you don't believe me.
Cool gaslighting attempt *eyeroll*
And yet you find more than one thread to post your denial on. Not looking too good when you claim not to be debating and then search out debates.
You have made your opinion known. You are not fooling anyone with false charges.I don't even necessarily deny climate change.
You've just been so militant in defending your position that you've confused discussion with raucous argument and decided to litter your posts with disrespect in the process (a surefire way to turn people away from what you're selling).
I made this thread as a form of commentary on the more recent focus on climate change and suggested that people might be going over the top with it - I never denied that climate change was a real thing.
Things aren't as black and white as they may seem to you.
You have made your opinion known. You are not fooling anyone with false charges.
So far your posts are rather trollish and indicate that you are extremely self centered and are only interested in causing trouble. You always could show me to be wrong by trying to post politely and properly.Oh give me a break.
Two questions:
1 - What is my opinion? (Apparently you have a better understanding of it than I do)
2 - What "false charges" have I made? (Not even sure what you're referring to here)
I'd suggest taking a far less belligerent approach to your engagement with this message board. Your internet road rage doesn't do you any favors.
So far your posts are rather trollish and indicate that you are extremely self centered and are only interested in causing trouble. You always could show me to be wrong by trying to post politely and properly.
No, you have shown a lack of intelligence when it comes to this topic. Did you forget your epic "ozone" fail? You were ignorant and rude from the start in your postings here. And you seem to have me conflated with someone else since I never even mentioned your avatar.
You are projecting at best here.
Can you try to be honest? That would be a goid start. Don't edit out parts of one's post where your obvious errors are pointed out so that you can ignore them.You've shown a lack of basic human respect throughout this topic and the other climate change thread and seem obsessed with assessing posters' intelligence rather than focusing on their arguments or knowledge on the topic.
It's funny that you accuse me of projecting; these last couple of exchanges have been little more than you deflecting.
I'll ask you again:
1 - What is my opinion on climate change? You've spent 4 days "debating" me about it - you must have some semblance of a clue.
2 - What "false charges" have I made?
Can you try to be honest?
1: When it comes to climate change you really do not seem to care, as long as you get what you want. You did not like it when it was pointed out that that sort of behavior is immoral.
2: Pretty much all of your personal attacks against me.
What have I been dishonest about?
I don't care about climate change as much as you seem to.
I don't care at all what you consider to be moral/immoral.
Yes, you have repeatedly. While complaining about others attacking you. Nice irony.I don't know you. And I haven't attacked you personally at all; I merely pointed out that insulting the intelligence of other posters is a very bad strategy to get people on your side.
Uhuh. So "simple rhetorical questions" are a concept that's new to you. Understood.Lol If you actually bothered to re-read our engagement in this thread, it was question answered with a question over and over again.
You answered nothing.
Uhuh. So "simple rhetorical questions" are a concept that's new to you. Understood.
Gentlemen, gentlemen -- to your corners please.
Shall we start over?