DISCLAIMER: My intention of coming into this thread was to share what I have learned, experienced, concluded, rather than prove something - because I see this question repeated for years - take just your threads alone - so many of them. So I thought the question is sincere enough to be answered.
actually thoughts, consciousness creates forms. and as i have explained to another, pure consciousness, nirguna brahman, is love. that is why the qualifier pure is used. only love is good, is pure.
love in it's pure state of consciousness is not a respecter of forms and has no distinguishable attributes
This is all fine. Prem jagat ka saar. Love is the essence. Without pure love it will all wither and die. (Before Love comes Anand, and before Anand comes Chit. Before Chit comes Sat.)
Also, NirguN Bramh is formless, Bramh and Prakruti cannot be separated. Agree with all this.
So what? Formless does not mean there is no One - The One - Seer, Witness, Experiencer , Fascilitator.
The universe is not a result of random electromagnetic fields.
If you agree that this is an infinite "neural" network, then that makes NirguN Bramh a PERSON! Formless Person. Organized universe => an organized Being, an organizer. Because what form can He fit in?
QUESTION: After subtracting the ego, are you a person or a neural network?
This is the PURUSHA of the Rig Veda - Thousand (figurative for infinite) -limbed Purush. That is the Supreme Being ! but why are you averse to Him? That is the One. That is the AtmA of the Universe. Your threads speak atheism - like there is no AtmA.
If you accept Pure Love why are you so averse to the Supreme Lover , the Purusha , the original embodiment, supplier and repository of Love and Anand? Let Him be, and don't worry He does not expect a second "you" to worship Him.
We are not speaking of duality (dvaita)
The evidence is subjective, but has been experienced by the Experiencer through rare forms, but of course not all forms.
Do not reduce yourself to electromagnetic fields. Do not underestimate yourself. .
Then again, it is not about forms. Being can remain formless. Invisible to the product, but revealing Self to the devotee,
Product cannot see the One who made it without effort.
However there is hope. :
Despite being entangled in the product here, the seeker can find the One and identify with the One, the Source Who has become all of this,
but there is a limit -- the once-seeker can now have the wisdom and experience but cannot be the cause of all. - so says the Bramh-sUtra conclusion 4.4.7 onwards. and it is very logically experienced.
----