• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Intelligent Design and People

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
That stuff is still flawed. It might be more enjoyable to some or even most people, but it's still flawed. A lot of times humans like things that have flaws more because they can identify more with them, or in the case of stamps and such, they are more rare, and so only a few can have them.

Of course, flaws are subjective. As was said before, what is a flaw to me may not be a flaw to you. But you can't be flawLESS if you have a flaw. The definition of flawless is "without flaws".
The point both you and Francine make is that "flawed" and "perfection" are human judgements.
 
Top