****ing Meat....

[McBell]

Any chance you're been bitten by a lone star tick?

Alpha-gal syndrome | CDC

What is alpha-gal syndrome, and what do we know about it?

www.cdc.gov

I doubt it.
Especially since the doctors say it is cancer.

 

[Audie]

Well, technically and depending the kind of salt, you could also change the temperature or the pressure or add chemicals but all those require energy.

Sure. And enuf chemistry, a field I did not
at all enjoy having to study.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I always assumed water was constant (ish) within our atmosphere and has been for billions of years. What's the problem with using it?

There is a limited supply of fresh water in areas. For example the Colorado river for all practical purposes no longer drains into the Gulf of California. So some people start looking at those crops that consume more water than others.

 

[John53]

Well?
What are they?
I assume there is more than one rule seeing as "rules" is plural....

One bacon to rule them all

 

[Revoltingest]

Well?
What are they?
I assume there is more than one rule seeing as "rules" is plural....

"Rules" is a verb.

 

[We Never Know]

One bacon to rule them all

Did someone say bacon?? I love me some bacon

 

[We Never Know]

I like meat. But these stats are sad to say the least.

View attachment 84027

Just courious...

What are the environmental impacts of roads, parking lots, complete destruction of forest for lumber, shopping malls, etc.

Its seems to me when it comes to land use change, they would have a bigger impact on the environment than chocolate.

 

[anna.]

I doubt it.
Especially since the doctors say it is cancer.

I'm sorry to hear that.

 

[Hold]

@McBell, I apologize for not back reading, I have been battling cancer for eight years. The type and location of cancer, notwithstanding, today there are medical methods for survival for many years.

 

[Revoltingest]

I doubt it.
Especially since the doctors say it is cancer.

There are bad kinds.
And there are kinds that merely annoy because of treatment indignities.
Choose the latter kind.

 

[ChristineM]

I doubt it.
Especially since the doctors say it is cancer.

Hoping it's one of the cancers that can be treated. My husband is a survivor, he was diagnosed in 2017.
Remember cancer is a word, not a sentence

 

[McBell]

Hoping it's one of the cancers that can be treated. My husband is a survivor, he was diagnosed in 2017.
Remember cancer is a word, not a sentence

I'm sorry to hear that.

@McBell, I apologize for not back reading, I have been battling cancer for eight years. The type and location of cancer, notwithstanding, today there are medical methods for survival for many years.

There are bad kinds.
And there are kinds that merely annoy because of treatment indignities.
Choose the latter kind.

Thanks guys (and gals)

I have accepted it.
It isn't the kill ya quick like a rabbit kind, so I still got a few years.
Assuming the Docs are right.
No worries though, I have made my piece with the world (or at least with the parts I feel the need to make piece with..)

 

[England my lionheart]

I like meat. But these stats are sad to say the least.

View attachment 84027

This reminds me of a conversation I had last week,my friend said “you usually go fishing at the weekend” I said it’s raining,my friend said surely the fish don’t care but I enlightened him to the fact that in a farming area the animal dung gets into the river,worse,if there’s a lot of rain it’s swiftly followed by human waste dumped in the river.

 

[Hold]

Thanks guys (and gals)

I have accepted it.
It isn't the kill ya quick like a rabbit kind, so I still got a few years.
Assuming the Docs are right.
No worries though, I have made my piece with the world (or at least wi the parts I feel the need to make piece with..)

Good Luck, when I was a young boy, Roy Rogers would sign off with, "Happy Trails to You". May it be so....

 

[Shaul]

It is a bogus chart. It uses unfounded bases.

 

[SalixIncendium]

It is a bogus chart. It uses unfounded bases.

Is that because they didn't run it by you before they published it?

Or did they just fail to take into consideration the impact of all the "natural causes" meat that one can eat?

 

[McBell]

It is a bogus chart. It uses unfounded bases.

What bases are used that are unfounded?

 

[Shaul]

Is that because they didn't run it by you before they published it?

Or did they just fail to take into consideration the impact of all the "natural causes" meat that one can eat?

No, it's because it is a bogus chart.

 

[Shaul]

What bases are used that are unfounded?

For one the measurement for cow emissions uses a basis that all of cow emissions should be factored into the beef and/or dairy emissions per kg. That is incorrect. Cows exist, and have existed, in their own right independent of whether they are used for food production or not. Also their emissions are a natural part of the ecosystem. Their emissions are not "new" or additional just because the cow is used for food instead of dying in the wild. So counting those emissions as integral to beef production is wrong.

 

[McBell]

For one the measurement for cow emissions uses a basis that all of cow emissions should be factored into the beef and/or dairy emissions per kg. That is incorrect. Cows exist, and have existed, in their own right independent of whether they are used for food production or not. Also their emissions are a natural part of the ecosystem. Their emissions are not "new" or additional just because the cow is used for food instead of dying in the wild. So counting those emissions as integral to beef production is wrong.

But their numbers are much greater.
Why?
"because the cow is used for food instead of dying in the wild"

In fact, how many cows are feral?