• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

In Search of a Label: Suggestions Welcome

Which Label do you think fits my description of my beliefs better?

  • Atheist

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Marxist-Atheist (Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao etc).

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Atheistic Left-Hand Path/Satanist

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 5 50.0%

  • Total voters
    10

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I confess I will take being called a poet as a compliment. I have wanted to be a writer for many years, but lack the dedication to the craft to actually sit down and practice the skill. :D
sometimes you just hace to find your muse. The landscape is mine and my daughter. Keep at it though dont stop. Sometimed thst means "although i walk through the valley of confusion, i will fear no moron"
.
Be your own voice discover who you are. And socrates said " thank god i am not an idiotic platonist and i am me or **** i would be listening to others about me and i would be not me and i would be confused who i am and they would say oh that socrates meant this i would say he is crazy i have no idea who he is"

Oh lots of therapy would be required for ole socrates right there!!
 

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
Have you tried just removing all the labels, and not trying to "be" anything? I've found it can be quite liberating to do that.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
I know there clearly are limits to the use of a label, but would you therefore classify me more as an "Atheist", a "Marxist-Atheist" (the Stalin variety) or as part of the "Atheistic Left-hand path"? Or Something else entirely?
I am not an expert on any of these. I believe you alone know what is best for you
And what I have "virtually" seen of you, you seem a kind person, open to see good
Follow your heart and whatever you need will come your way, that is what I believe
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Since I came to believe there was no god when I was about 5 or 6 years old (after having been introduced to the concept of "God" in primary school), I have always been an Atheist. However, in my experiences on Religious forums, I have found it profoundly difficult to relate to other atheists experiences and understanding.

For a very long time, my understanding of atheism was directly derived from Communism and Marxist materialism. I have always understood atheism as the conscious and deliberate denial of belief in the existence of any deity or belief in the supernatural as a whole. This is an indiscriminate atheism that affects all beliefs in deities and the supernatural. Moreover, it does not require evidence to assert that it is true; it just simply "is". It is a statement about the nature of reality that doesn't require proof to be true. the purpose of proof would more accurately be simply a means to rationalise the existing belief, rather than to decide it's validity. I have considered the possibility of Deism and Natural Theology as means to prove God exists, but only on the basis of "reason"- and reason doesn't and hasn't convinced me of anything in this area. It is closer to instinct, a belief so deeply held that it is almost physically impossible for me to imagine being anything other than it. Yes, I can empathise with believers and their experiences, but not with God being a physical or supernatural reality that has a direct personal effect on the course of my life.

Now, this is where the cliam I am an Atheist almost totally breaks down, as if god did exist, the position I'd take is most probably that God is responsible for the evil in the world and therefore is not worthy of worship or sanctification, but that there is a moral obligation to resist an evil deity. It would have to be a very forgiving and loving god to explain away all the suffering in the world to actually win my affection or loyalty. So if I did entertain a "theistic" belief, it is closer to "Misotheism" (hatred of god) or "Dystheism" (the belief that God is not wholly good or is in fact evil). I was particuarly strongly disposed to being Anti-Christian more than any other religion because of its cultural influence, but this was more to do with its dominance in the society I live in rather than singling it out (as I'd oppose all religions and deities given the opportunity). This treatment of religion as a basis for authoritarian social and political control means that the "hostility" towards religion has in the past, extended as far as sympathy for "State Atheism" in the past, namely that the forcible elimination of religion would be desirable as the elimination as a source of evil and suffering in the world. It was only slowly in time that I came to appreciate that there was no rational basis for justifying the use of force to compel others to believe as I did, nor that such compulsion was either desirable or effective. It would only add to the very cruelties and brutalities I originally opposed and would not make a better or more rational world.

In Marxism there was always an undercurrent on something called "God-Building" which treated Atheism/Socialism as something which had to satisfy the human desire for meaning and spirituality even in seeking to eliminate belief in the supernatural. In atheist philosophy, this fairly closely resembles some of the ideas of Fredrich Nietzsche, in that the "death of god" has a direct effect on morality. The denial of the existence of god, in this sense, also means the denial of the existence of a morality that could be derived from god. It can also draw inspiration from Existentialism and moral Nihilism as well. This tendency towards the criticism of moralities derived from religions means I have looked to develop moral views from non-religious sources, such as the Social Darwinist principle that Might is Right as well as a belief in the necessity of a "Sexual Revolution" against the sex-negative moralities that were sanctioned by religious authorities. In my case, being godless has raised questions about whether it is right to kill, steal or rape (in the abstract) in the absence of a transcendental morality, particularly as our actions are determined by our interests, our feelings and emotions and the power we have to determine the outcome of our actions in our favour. I don't run around doing any of these things, but there isn't any "moral" obligation to obey the law or observe the rules of society, beyond compassion, empathy, individual conscience and self-interest- which are not always very reliable ways of deciding right and wrong.

It should be fairly clear by now that I, in now way, resemble anything like the "New Atheists" (Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens and co) or the many "Agnostic Atheists" on this forum. I know that in starting this thread, I am throwing this wide open to the "define atheism" debate, but I figured that if I am to get along with people, I need to figure out what on earth is actually going on. Although I have distanced myself from Communism over the past year, the basic structure of this materialist-atheism remains the same, only I've started adopting more conservative views from a Social Darwinist view rather than revolutionary views from Marxist historical materialism.

If only to underline the differences further, my experience of "atheism" is deeply introspective and emotional. It is about passion, fury, rage, despair, awe, joy and love. There is so much intensity and colour in the world. Putting emotions right at the front of my "inner life" contrasts very sharply with the extent to which most atheists appear almost coldly logical and rationalistic. So, although I have no "religious" beliefs to speak of, the experience is intimately familiar and I relate and feel more comfortable around religious believers than I do my fellow non-believers. (Which is really confusing and perverse honestly.)

In my mind, given the extent of the hostility towards organised religion and god as sources of authoritarianism, my past flirtation with the desire to eliminate religious belief wholesale, the implications that the attack on religion has on morality and sexual taboos and paying only lip service to debates about trying to "prove" whether god exists or not, it would seem that I am closer to an atheistic satanist in pursuing a "left-hand path" that actively goes out of its way to undermine the "right-hand path" of organised religion- only most satanists are individualists and anti-communist, not collectivist with communist sympathies.

I know there clearly are limits to the use of a label, but would you therefore classify me more as an "Atheist", a "Marxist-Atheist" (the Stalin variety) or as part of the "Atheistic Left-hand path"? Or Something else entirely?


You lack belief in god or gods then you are atheist, everything else is incidental.

You want a label! You have several, Atheist, Marxist, maybe a bit Satanist and anything else you think fits your personality
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Since I came to believe there was no god when I was about 5 or 6 years old (after having been introduced to the concept of "God" in primary school), I have always been an Atheist. However, in my experiences on Religious forums, I have found it profoundly difficult to relate to other atheists experiences and understanding.

For a very long time, my understanding of atheism was directly derived from Communism and Marxist materialism. I have always understood atheism as the conscious and deliberate denial of belief in the existence of any deity or belief in the supernatural as a whole. This is an indiscriminate atheism that affects all beliefs in deities and the supernatural. Moreover, it does not require evidence to assert that it is true; it just simply "is". It is a statement about the nature of reality that doesn't require proof to be true. the purpose of proof would more accurately be simply a means to rationalise the existing belief, rather than to decide it's validity. I have considered the possibility of Deism and Natural Theology as means to prove God exists, but only on the basis of "reason"- and reason doesn't and hasn't convinced me of anything in this area. It is closer to instinct, a belief so deeply held that it is almost physically impossible for me to imagine being anything other than it. Yes, I can empathise with believers and their experiences, but not with God being a physical or supernatural reality that has a direct personal effect on the course of my life.

Now, this is where the cliam I am an Atheist almost totally breaks down, as if god did exist, the position I'd take is most probably that God is responsible for the evil in the world and therefore is not worthy of worship or sanctification, but that there is a moral obligation to resist an evil deity. It would have to be a very forgiving and loving god to explain away all the suffering in the world to actually win my affection or loyalty. So if I did entertain a "theistic" belief, it is closer to "Misotheism" (hatred of god) or "Dystheism" (the belief that God is not wholly good or is in fact evil). I was particuarly strongly disposed to being Anti-Christian more than any other religion because of its cultural influence, but this was more to do with its dominance in the society I live in rather than singling it out (as I'd oppose all religions and deities given the opportunity). This treatment of religion as a basis for authoritarian social and political control means that the "hostility" towards religion has in the past, extended as far as sympathy for "State Atheism" in the past, namely that the forcible elimination of religion would be desirable as the elimination as a source of evil and suffering in the world. It was only slowly in time that I came to appreciate that there was no rational basis for justifying the use of force to compel others to believe as I did, nor that such compulsion was either desirable or effective. It would only add to the very cruelties and brutalities I originally opposed and would not make a better or more rational world.

In Marxism there was always an undercurrent on something called "God-Building" which treated Atheism/Socialism as something which had to satisfy the human desire for meaning and spirituality even in seeking to eliminate belief in the supernatural. In atheist philosophy, this fairly closely resembles some of the ideas of Fredrich Nietzsche, in that the "death of god" has a direct effect on morality. The denial of the existence of god, in this sense, also means the denial of the existence of a morality that could be derived from god. It can also draw inspiration from Existentialism and moral Nihilism as well. This tendency towards the criticism of moralities derived from religions means I have looked to develop moral views from non-religious sources, such as the Social Darwinist principle that Might is Right as well as a belief in the necessity of a "Sexual Revolution" against the sex-negative moralities that were sanctioned by religious authorities. In my case, being godless has raised questions about whether it is right to kill, steal or rape (in the abstract) in the absence of a transcendental morality, particularly as our actions are determined by our interests, our feelings and emotions and the power we have to determine the outcome of our actions in our favour. I don't run around doing any of these things, but there isn't any "moral" obligation to obey the law or observe the rules of society, beyond compassion, empathy, individual conscience and self-interest- which are not always very reliable ways of deciding right and wrong.

It should be fairly clear by now that I, in now way, resemble anything like the "New Atheists" (Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens and co) or the many "Agnostic Atheists" on this forum. I know that in starting this thread, I am throwing this wide open to the "define atheism" debate, but I figured that if I am to get along with people, I need to figure out what on earth is actually going on. Although I have distanced myself from Communism over the past year, the basic structure of this materialist-atheism remains the same, only I've started adopting more conservative views from a Social Darwinist view rather than revolutionary views from Marxist historical materialism.

If only to underline the differences further, my experience of "atheism" is deeply introspective and emotional. It is about passion, fury, rage, despair, awe, joy and love. There is so much intensity and colour in the world. Putting emotions right at the front of my "inner life" contrasts very sharply with the extent to which most atheists appear almost coldly logical and rationalistic. So, although I have no "religious" beliefs to speak of, the experience is intimately familiar and I relate and feel more comfortable around religious believers than I do my fellow non-believers. (Which is really confusing and perverse honestly.)

In my mind, given the extent of the hostility towards organised religion and god as sources of authoritarianism, my past flirtation with the desire to eliminate religious belief wholesale, the implications that the attack on religion has on morality and sexual taboos and paying only lip service to debates about trying to "prove" whether god exists or not, it would seem that I am closer to an atheistic satanist in pursuing a "left-hand path" that actively goes out of its way to undermine the "right-hand path" of organised religion- only most satanists are individualists and anti-communist, not collectivist with communist sympathies.

I know there clearly are limits to the use of a label, but would you therefore classify me more as an "Atheist", a "Marxist-Atheist" (the Stalin variety) or as part of the "Atheistic Left-hand path"? Or Something else entirely?

So complucated you make it!
Atheists just dont believe in god. Simple.

I dont belueve in "god" any more
than I believe in Batboy or his secret moon labiratory.

Do you?

And why do you want a label? Howabout "ice cream eating
Abatboyist"?
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You lack belief in god or gods then you are atheist, everything else is incidental.

You want a label! You have several, Atheist, Marxist, maybe a bit Satanist and anything else you think fits your personality

A satanist is not a atheist
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
c6005af9ffe57917c03974a2cd764c56.jpg
 

Martin

Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
So complucated you make it!
Atheists just dont believe in god. Simple.

I dont belueve in "god" any more
than I believe in Batboy or his secret moon labiratory.

Do you?

And why do you want a label? Howabout "ice cream eating
Abatboyist"?

Ice-cream can be spiritual too. The Tantric Trinity of Neapolitan, and the Pristine Purity of Vanilla.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Is that the Oriental open minded view?

That is kind of a silly question.
But maybe I should be more pedantic and
point out that atheists would be satanic in
about the same percent as any other such
arbitrary grouping.

In the US it is not politically correct to say
"Oriental", which is why I use the term myself.
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
That is kind of a silly question.
But maybe I should be more pedantic and
point out that atheists would be satanic in
about the same percent as any other such
arbitrary grouping.

In the US it is not politically correct to say
"Oriental", which is why I use the term myself.

Sorry I'll be more polite 'atheists are Mephistophelian'
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So complucated you make it!
Atheists just dont believe in god. Simple.

I dont belueve in "god" any more
than I believe in Batboy or his secret moon labiratory.

Do you?

And why do you want a label? Howabout "ice cream eating
Abatboyist"?

For me atheism is a positive. It is not the absence of a belief in god, but the positive presence of naturalistic-materialist explanations for how nature and society works, how to live your life and why. The label describes something that is present, so I’m trying to describe what is there.

Simply not using a word doesn’t mean there is a thing or a quality to describe.

I am not an expert on any of these. I believe you alone know what is best for you
And what I have "virtually" seen of you, you seem a kind person, open to see good
Follow your heart and whatever you need will come your way, that is what I believe

Thanks. I will do. I do try to see the best in people and try to do the right thing, strange as that may seem given the OP. :)

As far as I know your engagement with Communism has been entirely based in individual study, with no organizational experience. Have you ever considered actually getting organized with other Communists?

I had a really bad start to the year and ended up in crisis housing for mental health issues. There were some problems at work and I got burned out by it. I’ve been recovering since then. For now, I’m trying to prioritise getting my own life and health sorted out. So I’m not rushing to join a political party for now.

I was in the Communist Party of Britain for several months, but never met another party member, went to a meeting or anything like that. I did consider joining another party, but it was too extreme. I live in a very rural and conservative area so local activism wouldn’t be very effective either way.

I’m just going to take my time and make sure I make the right decision if I do decide to join a party. I’m currently playing around on model us gov (a us government simulation) on reddit and learning things that way. Its more practical than reading and I can still try to have some fun, so its a step in the right direction. The news is very distressing to watch, but even if everyone else is going nuts, I’m determined not to join in. There are lots of things I’d like to do. :)
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
For me atheism is a positive. It is not the absence of a belief in god, but the positive presence of naturalistic-materialist explanations for how nature and society works, how to live your life and why. The label describes something that is present, so I’m trying to describe what is there.

Simply not using a word doesn’t mean there is a thing or a quality to describe.
:cool:. Very :cool: indeed
 
Top