The evidence for creation has been presented over and over, and the evolution proponents choose to ignore it:
1. Unlike Darwin, modern day evolutionists skip over the critical first step in the evolutionary process. i.e. how did life begin. The Bible gives the only plausible answer. Evolution cannot respond so they claim that is a question for another type of scientist.
This is the sort of thing that makes us wonder whether you are ignorant or dishonest. It's just so nonsensical. The Theory of Evolution (ToE) is not a theory about how life began. That's a separate subject, called abiogenesis, which biologists are working on but is not as well settled as evolution.
Once they figure that out, it will be a new, separate theory.
2. ToE propronents ignore the simple fact that an intelligently designed object or thing requires an intelligent designer. Evolutionists have no reasonable answer for this simple truth. Even single celled organisms or a single cell are hopelessly complex, brilliantly designed structures that put the largest human achievements to pale in comparison. Saying they have no builder (saying they 'evolved') is more nonsensical than saying a subdivision of well-built homes mutated into existence.
Can you not see how circular this argument is? Do I need to lay it out for you?
3. Despite all the posturing of evolutionists, the fossil record does not support transitional forms that Darwin supposed would eventually be found. Fossils show complex lifeforms appearing suddenly, with no transitional links between different biological families, and no partial body features.
This is simply, blatantly, false, as I would be happy to easily show you. And what on earth is a partial body feature?
As Heribert Nilsson, a swedish biologist wrote after 40 years of research, "It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of palaeobiological facts. The fossil material is now so complete that..the lack of transitional series cannot be explained as due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled."
Remember, quote mining = lying! For more on this dotty Swede who died over fifty years ago, and his whacko hypothesis that creatures spring into existence fully formed, read
here.
4. Scientists cannot reproduce what ToE claim happened totally randomly, the genesis of life.
I should preserve this one in amber. It may combine the highest percentage of errors per word of anything ever posted on the internet.
1. It's irrelevant. We're not discussing the origins of life.
2. ToE makes no claims whatsoever about the origins of life, so it's a lie.
3. ToE does not claim that anything happens randomly.
5. There is no evidence that one family of animals morphs into another, except in cartoons, although there is great variety in each family. People can be extremely short or extremely tall, and short parents can have tall offspring, but they're not producing a new species. The so-called speciation is nothing more than variety within a species. Biological families such as the horse family, cannot successfully mate with the cat family (or kind).
rusra really packs the mistakes in, doesn't he. His posts end up basically gibberish. ToE does not claim that anything morphs into anything. And again, he here denies that speciation happens, but like most YECs I believe actually asserts that it happens rapidly and constantly.
YECs excel at one thing, and that's evasion. You will not that rusra is still gibbering on about a non-existent category called a "kind," whatever that may be, but has ignored all reasonable requests to tell us what that might be.
6. The known facts support what the Bible says. Intelligence requires a mind, and a mind requires a living entity. The intelligence manifest in natural things is attributed in the Bible to an intelligent person, Jehovah, the grand Creator.
This poster is so deeply confused it's a wonder he's able to type. He seems not to have grasped the elementary concept, which I'm confident has been explained to him many times, that ToE is not atheism, any more than any other scientific theory is atheism.
BTW, I do not personally believe and more importantly the Bible does not teach that the earth is only 10,000 years old, a statement I have made repeatedly and the evolutionists apparently ignore.
Well, what is your position then? Explain it to us.