Read the Baha'i explanation of the "social laws" and "spiritual" unchangeable laws brought to the people they call "manifestations". Like I said, this question is for the Baha'is. They know what I'm talking about and want them to give me an answer.
Well, there are probs with that then, because, imo, not one single law of the 613 lawss of Moses was spiritual. Not one. They were all intended to cohese, strengthen, keep healthy and make successful the Israelites. I suppose it might be argued that the sacrificial laws were in some way spiritual, but I should reply that they were mostly in place to provide huge and happy incomes for the most privileged Levites, the Priesthood, and very good livings for the rest of the Levite clan. So the spiritual bit could fall flat right there.
Just you wait...... I'll get bashed by
@Tumah now.
As for you... Colossians 3:22 2 Timothy 2:24 Luke 3:14 Romans 13:1 Galatians 5:26? Only one is a quote from Jesus and in Luke 3:14 says not to take money by force and not to accuse falsely? Those two sound like part of the 10 commandments.... nothing new. On the others, too bad, but Paul is not Jesus. You might think he was inspired, and thanks for your interest in the questions, but I want Baha'is to tell me what specific new social laws Jesus brought.
I snatched a bunch at random, as you can see. There's loads of 'em. I do like the 'Slaves obey your masters' ones like Ephesians 6:5. I showed that one, together with the Colossians quote above, to the Missus. She made me paint the brickwork all round the house.
Now..... you mention that 'Jesus never said that'. I agree with you, but sadly most Christians don't. Paul, Cephas and all the apostles and Prophets whose writings made it in to the New Testament are God's Ordained Messengers who wrote God's Divine Words and therefore Jesus actually was speaking through them. Some Christians even mention Paul's mid-term dispensation or something, where he actually took over from Jesus. And so (imo) most of the upsetting and unhelpful dogma of most Churches is.... Paul's.
And there is a Bahai problem not wholly dissimilar to that, in that Bahauallah's writings have been adjusted here and there by one of his sons Abdul-Baha and his great-grandson (?) Shogi Effendi. It could be that those names actually caused, made or intitiated new laws. Further to that, the head governing body, the UHJ can enact or repeal laws as it sees fit to do so, and because it is divinely guided cannot make a mistake, even if it decides that up is down, I think that Bahauallah wrote, or possibly his son.
And so, there's that term again........ divine communication.