@InvestigateTruth or
@adrian009
I opened the bible just a minute ago and remember marking this verse years ago. I marked a a lot of verses when I read the bible.
"Now, Jesus did many other signs in the presence of [his] disciples that are not written in this book. But these are written that you may [come to] believe that jesus is the messiah, the son of god, and that through this belief you may have life in his name." John 20: 30-31 Brackets in NAV Bible
Now, Jesus did many other signs in front of his disciples that
are not written in this book. But by these
signs you may come to believe jesus is the messiah, the son of god that through this
belief you may have life in
his name.
I can't remember which of you I was talking to but one of you mentioned that I was interpreting scripture the way I wanted to rather than how scripture is written. Even though that is an insult, this is another scripture that backs up the one I said earlier John 5:39 that one of you think I misquoted.
Now, I'm quoting these verses throughout these thread and instead of refuting me with the bible, explain why I am wrong with these specific verses. Why is the bible the way to god and not christ himself?
What about the physical bible do you need to find the manifestation you're looking for? Even for christians who read this, how does these two scriptrues mean look to the bible for salvation rather than to christ?
What am I missing about going to christ to get to god?
How are the scriptures involved in this? Even Jews don't describe god (who god is rather than his attributes) nor does their Torah. Just I AM.
So what am I missing?