gnostic
The Lost One
Jay said:So, when was this Exodus of yours?
It means you provide the "when", and Jay will provide the proof that shows the Exodus is inaccurate.d.n.irvin said:So does that mean you have proof? or not?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jay said:So, when was this Exodus of yours?
It means you provide the "when", and Jay will provide the proof that shows the Exodus is inaccurate.d.n.irvin said:So does that mean you have proof? or not?
Read post #233...Can anyone give definitive proof -that the Bible is not Historically Accurate?
Anyone?
This reminds me of a joke;1) There is no archeological evidence showing any kind of military invasion of some culture outside of Canaan during the time the Bible says that the returning Israel took Canaan by force.
2) Even the Bible does not agree as to whether Jerusalem was a)completely annihilated, b) taken and the locals subjugated, c) partially annihilated.
3) Egypt has no record of a large number of foreigners living as slaves during that time.
4) There is no evidence to show that the United Kingdom under David was able to support or fund an army as large or as strong as the Bible says it was.
What kind of sound does a giraffe make?
None?
So how do you know if a giraffe is following you?
You don't hear anything.
This reminds me of a joke;
What kind of sound does a giraffe make?
None?
So how do you know if a giraffe is following you?
You don't hear anything.
Thank you.Maybe some expansion on sojourner's points will make things more clear:
1) The archaeological evidence shows a continuous culture in Canaan all through the era when the returning Israel would have taken Canaan by force. The change in culture that should have happened is shown to not have taken place; there is positive evidence that the culture that was there before the "invasion" is the same as the one that was there after.
3) Egyptians, who were generally meticulous record-keepers, did not seem to record any mention of a large number of Jewish slaves. If the Egyptians had kept large numbers of Jewish slaves, this behaviour would have been out-of-keeping with their usual modus operandi.
4) The evidence that would be present had the United Kingdom under David had as large or as strong as the Bible said it had, is not present.
Thank you.
Finkelstein, I. 1988. The Archaeology of the Israelite Settlement. Jerusalem.It means you provide the "when", and Jay will provide the proof that shows the Exodus is inaccurate.