ellenjanuary
Well-Known Member
I think you need to understand that moses was supposed to be the author.
At that time in history written language as we know it did not exist. Moses did not carry around blocks of stone with hyrogliphics on them.
These fables were orally passed down hundreds of years.
We can only guess how many authors there are but 5 seems to be the common theory.
divide the water is pretty clear, i dont think you have to dig to deep in this fiction to try and understand, inmy opinion
I thought it was six altogether; but my fat ol' NIV Study Bible seems convinced that Moses was the collator; if not the sole author.
I don't believe in fiction. If I say, "gazebabde taledawag;" next week there will be a Google entry. I believe these sacred works have a commonality; that their authors were able, for whatever reason, to glean a truth of lower entropy than was available to their contemporaries.
And, come on. "Wizard of Oz" is considered some kind of epic, and it's only from the thirties. Moses and his bush have that surpassed by two orders of magnitude. If it's "fiction," it's "essential fiction."