You still haven't answered my philosophical question. Do you not find it rather cruel that God would withhold heaven from us and then finally give it to us? Why are we here if we have all inherited heaven?
What about the Great Flood? What about God destroying whole cities? Was all of this also allegory? Did none of it really happen? Do you not think that God has dominion over the whole of His creation? Therefor, everything that happens here could have been stopped by God, no? He allows bad things to happen. Is that not cruel? Why would He do such a thing?
For you to believe the Bible to be inspired by God, you sure have a great problem in the number of times God shows his wrath and speaks of hell. I guess God was just being figurative with all of that though. Your position seems to be that you will just dismiss all mentions of wrath and hell as nothing more than allegory, but yet accept and twist the few passages that you have for universal salvation. Does it not bother you that there are mountains of evidence on one side and a bump in the Earth (that actually isn't even there) on the side that you believe?
Even if you dismiss a large portion of scripture as nothing more than allegory, you are still left with the conundrum that the allegory must actually mean something. What would you liken hell to if not God's wrath? What do you think it means when He talks about throwing Satan into the lake of fire for instance? Does that not, at the very least, show that God has wrath against some of His creation?
No, I don't. God gave us this earth as our island home. It was created good, and it is sufficient for our needs. If we hadn't royally desicrated it by our own sin, we wouldn't
need saving from it. What is cruel is a God who creates many, many of us to suffer eternally.
Allegory and the ascription of natural phenomena to "God's wrath." No. Clearly God gave humanity dominion over creation. We are to rule as the kings and queens of creation. Genesis says so. God did that because God loves us.
No. Human beings were writing through the lens of their own understanding. God is unchangeable, but our understanding and perception of God are certainly subject to change. have you actually
read the Bible? I mean, in a truly scholarly way? Please don't tell me that you can't see the great undercurrent of mercy and grace throughout the Biblical record. Such mercy and grace that is
always with God's people, no matter where they go, that
always saves God's people from evil, that is
always hospitable.
You're engaging in the same immature tendency as the ancient writers. The tendency to divide humanity into "us" and "them." Luckily, Jesus (as well as Paul) taught that there really is no such concept. (Who
was really the neighbor to the man beaten and dying on the road? Who
is our neighbor? The clean priest, or the dirty Samaritan? The clean Evangelical, or the dirty homosexual?) We have expanded our consciousness to accept
all humanity as part of God's people -- not just a select few.
Of course the allegory means something, or it wouldn't be there. I'm not stupid. The stories were written from the perspective of God's people, for God's people. Now that we've accepted all humanity as God's people, we find that God shows infinite grace and mercy to all humanity -- not just some amorphous elite.
So sue me.