Dingbat
Avatar of Brittania
No offense to anyone, but why exactly do Muslims hold that area so dear? Isn't it a Judaic area, historically?
Isra and Mi'raj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No offense to anyone, but why exactly do Muslims hold that area so dear? Isn't it a Judaic area, historically?
...
No. They would be in the exact same place, so only one could stand.
An honest question: What, in your mind, would qualify it as "a Judaic Area, historically"? What percentage of the area would have to have been held? ... over what continuous period? ... how recently? ... held directly of as a suzerainty?
People (particularly those who claim to be bible-literate) really should reread Samuel and Kings and then seek to form something other than a comic caricature of what is unfortunately called "Biblical History."
Nonsense. It's "tantamount" to suggesting that you educate yourself.That's tantamount to saying that the Temple Mount is a "comic caricature".An honest question: What, in your mind, would qualify it as "a Judaic Area, historically"? What percentage of the area would have to have been held? ... over what continuous period? ... how recently? ... held directly of as a suzerainty?No offense to anyone, but why exactly do Muslims hold that area so dear? Isn't it a Judaic area, historically?
People (particularly those who claim to be bible-literate) really should reread Samuel and Kings and then seek to form something other than a comic caricature of what is unfortunately called "Biblical History."
Or perhaps that is what you meant
Nonsense. It's "tantamount" to suggesting that you educate yourself.
My opinion is that people (particularly those who claim to be bible-literate) really should reread Samuel and Kings and then seek to form something other than a comic caricature of what is unfortunately called "Biblical History." Which part of that did you have difficulty understanding?without qualifying a clear opinion of your own
My opinion is that people (particularly those who claim to be bible-literate) really should reread Samuel and Kings and then seek to form something other than a comic caricature of what is unfortunately called "Biblical History." Which part of that did you have difficulty understanding?