martha
Active Member
I have noticed of late that these threads are the most viewed and the most posted to. Why is that? It seems to my uneducated mind that the scientiststs among you have the most supposed evidence. I on the other hand can only view life from my limited education and my own evidence of a Creator. Experience, which I will not go into here, for it will sidetract the thread.
Perhaps my view is limited, and extremely simplistic, but I wonder if any would consider the following. .....God or an untitled being has a desire to create. This being begins to create within it's own abilities. The creation that is formed, begins to change it's form over time, to adapt to it's environment due to certain outside influences, that by the way , the original creator had also created. Now this creation has to change or evolve just to survive, and so it does. Why is that? What makes the smallest creature evolve to survive. We can't say that that does not happen, can we. No, it is a reality. Evolution is reality.
Is this not the basis upon which scientists begin to explore? Do they not sometimes create a thesis, or physical experiment? Have we not cloned life?
Why do you both seem to butt heads? Why can't you agree that something had originally had a thought of creation and then started it? Why do you think that our creator is any different than we are. We create, and our ideas and creations evolve, no? Science has given us many answers to the causes of certain diseases, and with time, has eradicated them. Each one moving and evolving, with study and experiment, to it's present reality. Why would some say that there is no intelligent thought behind it? Is that theory any more rediculous than a big bang. How can one think that a gigantic explosion of particles would father all of the awesome life forms on this planet and in the universe as we understand it at this moment. How can we be so adament?
I know that my presentation of this question is simplistic and perhaps even childish in it's wording. There is no doubt in my mind, that those of you with more on the ball than I , will be able to understand my question and respond to it.
I compliment you all for your conviction of your beliefs and your mastery of the scientific world. It must be so wonderful to understand all of those scientific formulas in regards to existance. I personally cannot conceive the existance of this universe without some form of intellegence behind it. Of course, my dears, this is only my humble and simplistic opinion.
What do you think. Do you scientists really believe that all of the wonderous things you behold are just happenstance?
Frankly I am hesitant to hit the submit new thread button, for I fear that some might ridicule me. On the other hand, WHAT THE HECK! Who knows, maybe some one will find a way to convince me of their beliefs, or perhaps confirm my own. Oh well, here goes nothing!
Perhaps my view is limited, and extremely simplistic, but I wonder if any would consider the following. .....God or an untitled being has a desire to create. This being begins to create within it's own abilities. The creation that is formed, begins to change it's form over time, to adapt to it's environment due to certain outside influences, that by the way , the original creator had also created. Now this creation has to change or evolve just to survive, and so it does. Why is that? What makes the smallest creature evolve to survive. We can't say that that does not happen, can we. No, it is a reality. Evolution is reality.
Is this not the basis upon which scientists begin to explore? Do they not sometimes create a thesis, or physical experiment? Have we not cloned life?
Why do you both seem to butt heads? Why can't you agree that something had originally had a thought of creation and then started it? Why do you think that our creator is any different than we are. We create, and our ideas and creations evolve, no? Science has given us many answers to the causes of certain diseases, and with time, has eradicated them. Each one moving and evolving, with study and experiment, to it's present reality. Why would some say that there is no intelligent thought behind it? Is that theory any more rediculous than a big bang. How can one think that a gigantic explosion of particles would father all of the awesome life forms on this planet and in the universe as we understand it at this moment. How can we be so adament?
I know that my presentation of this question is simplistic and perhaps even childish in it's wording. There is no doubt in my mind, that those of you with more on the ball than I , will be able to understand my question and respond to it.
I compliment you all for your conviction of your beliefs and your mastery of the scientific world. It must be so wonderful to understand all of those scientific formulas in regards to existance. I personally cannot conceive the existance of this universe without some form of intellegence behind it. Of course, my dears, this is only my humble and simplistic opinion.
What do you think. Do you scientists really believe that all of the wonderous things you behold are just happenstance?
Frankly I am hesitant to hit the submit new thread button, for I fear that some might ridicule me. On the other hand, WHAT THE HECK! Who knows, maybe some one will find a way to convince me of their beliefs, or perhaps confirm my own. Oh well, here goes nothing!