Note that I have no problem (Except the lack of fossilized and DNA evidence.) with evolution as it occurred after the first organism and perhaps there is a different word or theory for the creation of the universe that I'm refferring to and that I'm not aware of. It's the basis of the first evolutions that makes little sense to me. Somehow, somewhere, an organism was spontaneously generated (Can this be reacreated in a lab?) and after that, Darwinian evolution takes hold as the strongest survive, who happen to have that instinct for survival, and continue to change and adapt to their environment.
- There is no lack of fossil or DNA evidence, as both make more than compelling cases for evolution. My previous post addressed the fossil record. As for DNA, take a look at the mouse genome.
- The theory you are addressing really does have nothing to do with evolution. It's called abiogenesis and you can read about it. (here and here)
- It is survival of the fittest not the strongest. It's not about being the strongest, it's about being most effective in passing your genes on.