Road Less Traveled
Active Member
My apologies for misreading your post. Yes, that's exactly what I thought you said, but you clarified it. Thanks!
All good my friend, good to get that cleared up. No need to apologize, I’ve done it too.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
My apologies for misreading your post. Yes, that's exactly what I thought you said, but you clarified it. Thanks!
We were not talking about something that is not true. I gave you an extremely strong hint that anyone with even a middle school level of knowledge of genetics would have picked up. That you did not do so tells us that you know nothing of the subject.
If your attempt to debate is genuine you would admit the obvious. But since you will not admit the obvious this article may help:
Sex-linked recessive: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia
No, you made a rather ignorant and incorrect claim. That link was there to help you understand your error.Yes, that really is so far from the point that it is perhaps better if you forget the whole matter, if you can’t tell how homosexuality is inherited and what causes it.
No, you made a rather ignorant and incorrect claim. That link was there to help you understand your error. ...?
Ok, so you are suggesting homosexuality is a disease? Now, if that is true, there should be a cure for it? And you apparently know what causes homosexuality? So, what is/are the gene(s) that cause it
...If you are one there is not anything that you can do about it. ...
Psychological studies show that time after time "conversion therapy" fails miserably. In fact it is now thought to be abuse.Why do you believe so?
Maybe you are wrong and everyone thinks you are stupid
They have a narrative that homosexuality is a choice. If it is a choice then they feel justified in discriminating against them.
According to the Bible, eating pork and adultery are also sins. Adultery is punishable by death. How have you done either? Have you condoned anyone who has committed these sins?
You do not know what "truth" is. Perhaps English is a second language for you and that did not translate correctly. When you claim it is a "truth" you put the burden of proof upon yourself. So please prove that homosexuality is a choice.I believe the truth is that it is a choice. I do not believe in discriminating against people other than to do that which is right.
Psychological studies show that time after time "conversion therapy" fails miserably. In fact it is now thought to be abuse.
It fails, if the person doesn’t really want to reject the habit. Similarly as alcoholics fail, if they don’t really want to give up that habit.
Everyone who claims homosexuality is a sin must necessarily be bisexual. Here is why.
According to the traditional definitions of sin, sin must always involve a choice. Thus, the claim that attraction to the same sex is sinful implies that attraction to the same sex is a choice. But no one chooses who they are sexually attracted to. Nevertheless, people who are bisexual can choose to ignore one aspect of their sexuality, so that they can have the illusion of choice. This is why we see so many bisexual people claim to have "found Jesus," and "repent" of their homosexuality, and make the "choice" to be heterosexual. In reality, they are simply choosing to ignore the homosexual aspect of their sexuality and choose to only focus on the heterosexual aspect.
For people who are either 100% heterosexual or 100% homosexual, sexual orientation is not a choice. For instance, I could not choose to be attracted to men, even if I wanted to be. In the same way, a homosexual person could not choose to be attracted to the other gender if they wanted to be. A person who is 100% heterosexual or 100% homosexual would understand this, which begs the question, why do so many Christians, especially pastors, claim that homosexuality is a choice? I think that the only logical answer is that bisexuality is fairly commonplace in the population, and likely even more common among Christian pastors.
So, since our conclusion implies bisexuality is likely much more common in Christian pastors than in the rest of the population, we should encourage these pastors to celebrate their bisexuality, rather than trying to mask it in homophobic preaching. A study has already confirmed that homophobic men who claim to be heterosexual have measurable responses of arousal to gay porn, while non-homophobic heterosexual men do not. See this study, which verifies my ideas. Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? - PubMed - NCBI
Nope. Never says being homosexual is abomination, either. Nothing wrong with being homosexual, and anyone who tells you the Bible says anything different has either never read, or doesn't understand, it.
Thanks for your reply. Have you spoken out against those who are misusing the Bible?I believe the Holy Spirit is now the one that says what must be done. So it matters not what was done in the OT but it matters what Jesus wants done now. I do not condone any sin.
You should read what the Bible actually says the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah were, before invoking them. Merely being homosexual was not one of them.Tell that to Sodom and Gomorrah
No it isn't. Nowhere does the Bible say it is.Homosexuality is a sin,
maybe because you and people like you keep telling him his inherent nature is sinful. You should stop doing that.I've seen it first hand my best friend has been gay since 5th grade and 16 years later he's stuck and has so much despair,
I disagree with your claim that same-sex attraction is sinful.Everyone who claims homosexuality is a sin must necessarily be bisexual. Here is why.
According to the traditional definitions of sin, sin must always involve a choice. Thus, the claim that attraction to the same sex is sinful implies that attraction to the same sex is a choice. But no one chooses who they are sexually attracted to. Nevertheless, people who are bisexual can choose to ignore one aspect of their sexuality, so that they can have the illusion of choice. This is why we see so many bisexual people claim to have "found Jesus," and "repent" of their homosexuality, and make the "choice" to be heterosexual. In reality, they are simply choosing to ignore the homosexual aspect of their sexuality and choose to only focus on the heterosexual aspect.
For people who are either 100% heterosexual or 100% homosexual, sexual orientation is not a choice. For instance, I could not choose to be attracted to men, even if I wanted to be. In the same way, a homosexual person could not choose to be attracted to the other gender if they wanted to be. A person who is 100% heterosexual or 100% homosexual would understand this, which begs the question, why do so many Christians, especially pastors, claim that homosexuality is a choice? I think that the only logical answer is that bisexuality is fairly commonplace in the population, and likely even more common among Christian pastors.
So, since our conclusion implies bisexuality is likely much more common in Christian pastors than in the rest of the population, we should encourage these pastors to celebrate their bisexuality, rather than trying to mask it in homophobic preaching. A study has already confirmed that homophobic men who claim to be heterosexual have measurable responses of arousal to gay porn, while non-homophobic heterosexual men do not. See this study, which verifies my ideas. Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? - PubMed - NCBI