... or by the gullibility of the faithful.sojourner said:One cannot measure the veracity of Jesus' existence by the actions of human beings.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
... or by the gullibility of the faithful.sojourner said:One cannot measure the veracity of Jesus' existence by the actions of human beings.
What's sad is you have such a wealth of knowledge which others could learn from, but instead you resort to petty insults. That's what's sad..Jayhawker Soule said:Do you have any idea when Paul died? Do you have any idea of when the gospels are thought to have been written and by whom? It's really a bit sad ...
Others can and will learn absolutely nothing so long as they feel perfectly justified to offer opinions - or even speculation - based on a gross poverty of relevant knowledge. If you're intent on participating in a debate thread, have enough respect for the topic at hand to at least know what you don't know. And no, it is highly unlikely that the Gospels were a post mortem Pauline forgery.jeffrey said:What's sad is you have such a wealth of knowledge which others could learn from, but instead you resort to petty insults. That's what's sad..Jayhawker Soule said:Do you have any idea when Paul died? Do you have any idea of when the gospels are thought to have been written and by whom? It's really a bit sad ...jeffery said:If Paul created Christianity, then the gospels where forged by him also? And what would be the purpose of him doing so?
Then by your standards, this forum would consist of what, maybe 3 people? Please note, I asked a question, not stated an opinion. If Paul created Christianity, as Rob implied, then he must have either forged the gospels or had co-conspirators.Jayhawker Soule said:If you're intent on participating in a debate thread, have enough respect for the topic at hand to at least know what you don't know.
kai said:all this talk of nazereth i thought he was born in bethlehem i even went to the church of the nativity there have i been conned
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence but i dont know either way i have always been confused about the jesus of nazereth bitJamesThePersian said:He was born in Bethlehem and lived in Nazareth (unless, of course, you accept the idea that He never lived at all).
James
kai said:absence of evidence is not evidence of absence but i dont know either way i have always been confused about the jesus of nazereth bit
ProfLogic said:(I am not taking about their fossils, since people would say jesus resurrected body and soul - unbelievable). The body is purely physical.
Or he lived and the birth narrative was creative back-fill produced decades later.JamesThePersian said:He was born in Bethlehem and lived in Nazareth (unless, of course, you accept the idea that He never lived at all).
Jayhawker Soule said:Or he lived and the birth narrative was creative back-fill produced decades later.
You paint with too wide a brush. There is a world liberal Christian theology populated by self-proclaimed Christians who choose not to park their brains outside when they walk into their Church. So, for example, I would not be at all surprised to find UU members rejecting the historicity of the virgin birth narrative much as they reject the historicity of the Ark narrative.JamesThePersian said:... as a Christian I reject all such and accept what I consider the truth. You can't expect me to be skeptical about the veracity of the Gospels surely?
Jayhawker Soule said:You paint with too wide a brush. There is a world liberal Christian theology populated by self-proclaimed Christians who choose not to park their brains outside when they walk into their Church. So, for example, I would not be at all surprised to find UU members rejecting the historicity of the virgin birth narrative much as they reject the historicity of the Ark narrative.
And disagreeing with your opinion does not render my post an ad hominem.JamesThePersian said:I'm sure you know better than to suggest that I park my brains when it comes to religion, however. Disagreeing with your opinion does not mean that I must be a blind follower of dogma.
Jayhawker Soule said:And disagreeing with your opinion does not render my post an ad hominem.