mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Please see these two quote from you, both within the paragraph above:
Can you tell me how these two statements are reconciled? "I don't believe..." and "I only have beliefs?" I mean... maybe I am wrong and the "positive or negative version of the really real or not real" isn't a catch-all statement, and so there are some items left that one can have "only belief" in that aren't included in "positive or negative version of the really real or not real." Enlighten me - I'm all ears.
Here it is.
Replace the world/the universe/everything/realty with X and all variations of what they are with Y, Z, W and so on.
Now notice the following for humans who both claim to know what X is. I.e. X is Y and not Z versus X is Z and not Y. One of them don't know, so I figure out that I don't need to know what X really is and I don't need to believe in that I know what X really is.
It has to do with suspension of judgement in skepticism. I hold no judgement with truth, proof, evidence and so on for what X really is. I.e. I believe in the everyday word, but I don't know what it is as a case of X. In technical terms I haven't solved epistemological solipsism, yet I believe in the everyday world.