Jihad for atheism! Oh this so so impressive.
Anti-theists are like the radical jihadi of Atheism for some odd reason.
They will criticize mankind for not accepting the final non-prophet, Christopher Hitchens.
I just do not understand the appeal of being this aggressive with religion. This seems more along the lines of Ayn Rand's ideology
I understand the appeal. And I like Hitchens. I even agree with a lot of what he says, to a degree. My methodology would be quite different though. I'm less taken with Dawkins. Harris I like, I just don't find him as interesting as Hitchins...lol
If you want my pop-psychological take on it, it's kinda comforting for a human (any human) to have a voice of authority to look up to. If you're a follower of a religion, you have your local religious figures, who may be up to the task. You have other followers, who may be up to the task. And ultimately, you have your book of faith, or guru, or prayer, or whatever.
That's not the case for an atheist. I would say exactly ZERO of my friends meet the following criteria;
1) Close enough to have religious debates or in depth discussions with, realising we might disagree strongly.
2) Are well-read and articulate about religion (at least in relative terms)
3) Have a position of non-belief
I can have in depth religious discussions with my religious friends, although most of them will shy away because of point 2. But still, they understand their own religion at least. But it's not the same as having people with similar thoughts that you can refine your worldview with.
That all being the case, there is something to be said for having a voice which speaks with authority, wit and in an articulate and reasoned manner about the same lack of belief you share. I wouldn't describe myself as 'anti-theist' but if someone gave me a magic wand and let me either keep or remove all religion from the world instantly, I would remove it.
The problem is when people start accepting everything someone like Hitchins (or Dawkins, or Harris, etc) says, and treating it like some sort of gospel. That is NOT what they would want, interestingly. But there are those who do it, I understand that.
I've mentioned before, but not in this thread, I don't read much 'atheist' literature. I have literally 3 books in my library you could maybe count as atheist. Beyond Good and Evil is more general philosophy, I have a book called 'Does God Exist' which presents mixed chapters in a debate style, featuring an atheist and a theologian, and I have God is Not Great.
And, as a general point, I'm okay with criticism of anything, including religious, or non-religious beliefs. When criticism becomes violent action, or incitement to violent action, I think a line has been crossed. In that sense, I think the comparison of anti-theists to radical jihadists is pure hyperbole.