joelr
Well-Known Member
Right and just saying "blather" shows no evidence and proves you cannot debunk it or debate it. This is almost every post from you. The others are demands for evidence. Ha.
And that would be a fail because they have evidence. Notice the first word of this quote.........
"Evidence of microbes was also preserved in the hard structures (“stromatolites”) they made, which date to 3.5 billion years ago."
More dishonesty. You have clearly not reviewed archeological evidence for early Israel.
another source is an enemy of Israel who has a wall inscription explaining that " Israel was a Canaanite group indistinguishable from all other Canaanite groups."
From - K. L. Noll, Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: An Introduction,
the archeological evidence is vast. Why this would bother you and give you cause for more denial is unknown?
"The consensus of modern scholars is that the Bible does not give an accurate account of the origins of the Israelites, who appear instead to have formed as an entity in the central highlands of Canaan in the late second millennium BCE from the indigenous Canaanite culture.[3][4][5] Most scholars believe that the story of the Exodus has some historical basis, but that any such basis has little resemblance to the story told in the Bible."
"Based on the archaeological evidence, according to the modern archaeological account, the Israelites and their culture did not overtake the region by force, but instead branched out of the indigenous Canaanite peoples that long inhabited the Southern Levant, Syria, ancient Israel, and the Transjordan region[8][9][10] through a gradual evolution of a distinct monolatristic—later cementing as monotheistic—religion centered on Yahweh. The outgrowth of Yahweh-centric monolatrism from Canaanite polytheism started with Yahwism, the belief in the existence of the many gods and goddesses of the Canaanite pantheon but with the consistent worship of only Yahweh."
Do you have an actual memory problem? Or is this just more dishonesty? This has been addressed. You then come back with unsupported crank creationist magic (turtles/fishbowl) and I do not care about your personal delusions.
We have covered evidence for this. You failed to put forward any evidence that debunks it. I do not care about your turtles delusions, no thank you, go away.
Actually I looked into that. It turns out that archeology, historicity and comparative religion fields show that to be a mythology the same as all others.
There is no evidence that spacetime is any different anywhere. We can see billions of years into the past. Everything looks fine.
Even if it all were an illusion and we were inside a fishbowl, how would that matter? It's still reasonable to use visual evidence and work from there? The only reason you even have this fishbowl crank is because of a fictional story?
You give no evidence, you make no alternative arguments, you just sit around and complain about scientists who are actually WORKING? All you want to do is complain about our knowledge of deep space, then counter any evidence with "fishbowl", then when asked for an alternative or evidence you whine "I don't have to have evidence.." and then look to re-start the same process?
Why don't you get a PhD and work towards proving your crank? I know trolls are not about education, self improvement or anything constructive so I'm a fool for asking.
Somehow winding around in this stupid circular argument seems endless fulfilling for you?
No, relativity says there is no "special" position, everything is the same in the entire spacetime. That is the point.
The theory doesn't allow or give any reason to suspect things change like that.
And yet you did.
You mean "I'm too lazy too actually learn enough about the big bang model to even try to debunk it".
This is one of the trolliest troll things ever.
Provide evidence that the big bang is wrong.
Noah is a myth who never lived. The myth was written 9BC.
please reference what you are even talking about. Use your words. However if it was dated through radiometric dating, or Hebrew calendar dates were used I do not care. I'm not debating scholarship with someone who is clearlu uneducated and says ridiculous things like "I don't need to debunk the big bang because it's a fable".......
no thank you, go away.
I know, those historians, what a bunch of idiots!. Luckily we have flat earthers and creationists to tell us the truth!
They also find words, stories, scripture, stone tablets.
God is not a liar because Yahweh isn't a god, it's a made up myth same as Zeus and Odin.
"And the biblical writers have enlarged the story."
Entire field of evolutionary biology vs internet troll who refuses to provide evidence for crank ideas,
Cool, here is William Denver's wiki page, I didn't see anything about hate, bias or ignorance.
Please provide evidence.
William G. Dever - Wikipedia
In fact, to your point of "profound ignorance"
"William Gwinn Dever (born November 27, 1933, Louisville, Kentucky)[1] is an American archaeologist, specialising in the history of Israel and the Near East in biblical times. He was Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona in Tucson from 1975 to 2002. He is a Distinguished Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology at Lycoming College in Pennsylvania. He is married to Pamela Gaber, professor of Old Testament and Judaic Studies at Lycoming College."
what profound ignorance is is spewing hate on theories like the big bang and not actually knowing anything about the theory. Or the archeology, history and whatever else you try to hate on. Profound.
Creationism qualifies as last thursdayism. Unfortunately for you scholarship is in consensus about Moses:
"Scholarly consensus sees Moses as a legendary figure and not a historical person,[10][11] while retaining the possibility that a Moses-like figure existed in the 13th century BCE.[12][13]"
"The consensus of modern scholars is that the Bible does not give an accurate account of the origins of the Israelites, who appear instead to have formed as an entity in the central highlands of Canaan in the late second millennium BCE from the indigenous Canaanite culture.[3][4][5] Most scholars believe that the story of the Exodus has some historical basis, but that any such basis has little resemblance to the story told in the Bible."
The Exodus - Wikipedia
