Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
It's a paradox, not a contradiction. You have seen the Father in Christ but not in his glory.Which is a paradox because we (the Jews) both, saw and didn't saw, or we saw the invisible.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's a paradox, not a contradiction. You have seen the Father in Christ but not in his glory.Which is a paradox because we (the Jews) both, saw and didn't saw, or we saw the invisible.
I can believe that.It's a paradox, not a contradiction. You have seen the Father in Christ but not in his glory.
Ya know. I am amazed an Christians. Mormons believe more in the Bible than protestants and catholics.
I dont see that as a contradiction.
Did G-d make his scripture so complex that you can't even believe the words on the written page!
Next you will say that there you have to Believe in the trinity for salvation. Which is again an add on by so called scholars.
So John 1.1.
1. In the beginning was the word.
Jesus was the beginning of the creation. Just as he stated in rev 3:14.
Why can't the words on the page be enough. Why believe the traditions of men
2. And the qord was with God.
Yes again. He was there and He created the heavens and the earth as stated
3. And the word was God
Again as stated in Matt 28. 18. Why can't we believe the words on the page. This time im red and white.
Question to all and maybe should be on another thread.
Are or should the words attributed to Christ (which in John 12.50) be a higher priority to believe in.
Also. Johns gospel was not complete and took many years to produce. John did have time (and I am thankful) to see and think thru all that he wrote.
Last comment.
If we can not even believe the word attributed the Jesus: i ascend to my father and to your father my God and your God.
Then Christianity is false!!!
Brothes and sisters. The gospel is made for the unlearned to understand. Please stop making it so hard that no one w/o a masters in Christian doctrine can believe.
We are the trinity John 14:20
Me too.I can believe that.
The issues here is how we approach into solving contradictions:
My stance and demonstrations so far is that contradictions are to be solved with specific verses or broader contexts which directly refute or unravel some contradiction.
From what I see your approach is that specific contradiction should be taken literarily, that is word by word because the bible is unfailable word of God and should be taken as such.
Therefore if that's true, there is no way for us to come to any agreement because I think your method of bible contradiction solving is not applicable to the problem.
Yes I do read the word literally. That came about due to evil in the church o went to at the time that I had to go and find Jesus again to be whole.
Question. Why should I be worried about what you are calling contradictions.
As stated i have to believe the words in red above all. Now I do understand that flies in the face of spoon fed theology.
But again. I have to believe the words attributed to the savior above all others or there is no anchor of truth. All word in the Bible are not equal. Jesus first then the others.
Thanks for the discussion
God is spirit, he is manifest in his subordinate sons. For now the closest we can get to seeing the Father is the divinity in the person of Jesus.I want to hear from other fellow Christians their interpretation of the John 1:18a:
See also Exodus 33:20
Here is an argument:
The issue here is not whether Jesus is God or not because John 1:18b says "The only Son, God"
- No one has ever seen God
- People (Jews) saw Jesus
- Therefore Jesus is not God
So the argument above can easily be refuted with:
- No one has ever seen God (the Father)
- People saw Jesus (the Son)
- Therefore Jesus (the Son) is not the Father
We know the definition of holly trinity is that:
The Son IS NOT the Father IS NOT holly ghost, but all of which IS ONE GOD.
Therefore problem seems to be solved but...
However it's not that easy!
Consider another verse from John 14:9 where Jesus himself says this:
This is a clear contradiction with quote above Exodus 33:20
Suppose you're debating a non Christian and he\she presents you with this problem.
How would you as an apologist explain this contradiction?
Believe me, I understand you more than what you think I do.Yes I do read the word literally. That came about due to evil in the church o went to at the time that I had to go and find Jesus again to be whole.
I think anyone who is into the bible or is interested into studying the bible should be worried about contradictions, although not worried literally but rather interested in.Question. Why should I be worried about what you are calling contradictions.
There is an old saying: "Trust but verify"...As stated i have to believe the words in red above all. Now I do understand that flies in the face of spoon fed theology.
But again. I have to believe the words attributed to the savior above all others or there is no anchor of truth. All word in the Bible are not equal. Jesus first then the others.
I want to hear from other fellow Christians their interpretation of the John 1:18a:
See also Exodus 33:20
Here is an argument:
The issue here is not whether Jesus is God or not because John 1:18b says "The only Son, God"
- No one has ever seen God
- People (Jews) saw Jesus
- Therefore Jesus is not God
So the argument above can easily be refuted with:
- No one has ever seen God (the Father)
- People saw Jesus (the Son)
- Therefore Jesus (the Son) is not the Father
We know the definition of holly trinity is that:
The Son IS NOT the Father IS NOT holly ghost, but all of which IS ONE GOD.
Therefore problem seems to be solved but...
However it's not that easy!
Consider another verse from John 14:9 where Jesus himself says this:
This is a clear contradiction with quote above Exodus 33:20
Suppose you're debating a non Christian and he\she presents you with this problem.
How would you as an apologist explain this contradiction?
I want to hear from other fellow Christians their interpretation of the John 1:18a:
See also Exodus 33:20
Here is an argument:
The issue here is not whether Jesus is God or not because John 1:18b says "The only Son, God"
- No one has ever seen God
- People (Jews) saw Jesus
- Therefore Jesus is not God
So the argument above can easily be refuted with:
- No one has ever seen God (the Father)
- People saw Jesus (the Son)
- Therefore Jesus (the Son) is not the Father
We know the definition of holly trinity is that:
The Son IS NOT the Father IS NOT holly ghost, but all of which IS ONE GOD.
Therefore problem seems to be solved but...
However it's not that easy!
Consider another verse from John 14:9 where Jesus himself says this:
This is a clear contradiction with quote above Exodus 33:20
Suppose you're debating a non Christian and he\she presents you with this problem.
How would you as an apologist explain this contradiction?
People saw manifestations of God throughout the Bible. Abraham even ate and talked with God.
But no one has seen God in his unveiled glory because he dwells in light that no one can approach unto. (1 Timothy 6:16) It is Jesus who reveals him. Because he manifests this invisible and unseeable God. Jesus' body is referred to as the veil in Hebrews 10:20. So of course Jesus human body was hiding the glory of God.
This is no doubt why the veil was wrent in the temple when he died. It showed that the veil (his body) was dead.
Often in the Bible God appears hidden within a cloud called the Shekinah by some people. But the Shekinah cloud is not God. It's an angel (taking form of a cloud) that hides the glory of God. Otherwise anyone who sees God unveiled would die.
Moses did manage to see the back of God. But not his front. And he only saw God's back because God covered him with his hand and he was hidden in the cleft of a rock. So basically, Moses could only see God's back because of some kind of protection.
My phone has been messing up. Hope this works.
When does a father keep his face from his children??? He doesn't..
When does a puppy become a dog?
We Are the literal offspring of God the father created in his image.
From Genesis chapter 1 verse 28.. To psalms 82 verse 6. To John chapter 10 verse 31 to 36. And to Romans chapter 8 for 17.
God loves us and will keep nothing back for those that love Him.
I don't think so Clara ... first of all this was before the command "thou shalt not kill" was given. I believe the test was a test of his faith as per Hebrews 11:19 which says that Abraham believed God would raise Isaac from the dead. Because Abraham already believed God's promise that Isaac would be the father of a great nation. Isaac's seed would be like the sand on the seashore or the stars of heaven. So since Abraham believed this; he knew that even if he sacrificed Isaac, he wouldn't stay dead. Because God doesn't lie.ABRAHAM:
Abraham's talk with the spiritual world didn't go well....he was asked murder his son Isaac to secure a place for himself in heaven. This was after God made it clear "thou shalt not kill" and it was obvious that one would not be able to get into heaven with a self-serving act. It was a test, not of loyalty to God, but a test of Abraham's knowledge of God's laws ("thou shalt not kill.")
Hmm ... I do believe people have gone to heaven but not on their own strength. So you could be right. Like John in the book of Revelation was taken up. So was Elijah in a chariot of fire. There was no one (other than Jesus) who ascended up by their own power. Even the angels Jacob saw needed a stairway/ladder to go back and forth to heaven. So they couldn't just ascend into heaven at will without a ladder.CAN'T SEE GOD IN HEAVEN:
"But no one has seen God in his unveiled glory because he dwells in light that no one can approach unto." (1 Timothy 6:16)
Psychics who tried to enter heaven and hell to see what is there have never been able to make it. It is because hell is a prison surrounded by a psychic vortex, and that is what makes the pain and sensation of fire. Heaven, on the other hand, is also surrounded by a psychic vortex, but the idea is to keep souls out, not in. The power of these vortices is so great that even the most skilled psychics are not able to penetrate.
Perhaps. I don't really know. Shekinah is a Jewish concept and supposed to be the glory of God or something that hides the glory of God. It's also feminine rather than masculine.I suppose that this psyhic vortex is called the Shekinah.
Nice one, but we are back to same problem as before, which is taking word for word literally without considering the context which in this case explains appearance of God.Isaiah 6:5. He sees G-d in all his glory
But his sins were also removed first.
Question. Who Isaiah saw. Was it jehovah. Jesus Christ?
At the sound of that cry, the frame of the door shook and the house was filled with smoke.
This is a trick question because there are 2 possible answers:Question. Who Isaiah saw. Was it jehovah. Jesus Christ?
One cried out to the other:
“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts!
All the earth is filled with his glory!”
I want to hear from other fellow Christians their interpretation of the John 1:18a:
See also Exodus 33:20
Here is an argument:
The issue here is not whether Jesus is God or not because John 1:18b says "The only Son, God"
- No one has ever seen God
- People (Jews) saw Jesus
- Therefore Jesus is not God
So the argument above can easily be refuted with:
- No one has ever seen God (the Father)
- People saw Jesus (the Son)
- Therefore Jesus (the Son) is not the Father
We know the definition of holly trinity is that:
The Son IS NOT the Father IS NOT holly ghost, but all of which IS ONE GOD.
Therefore problem seems to be solved but...
However it's not that easy!
Consider another verse from John 14:9 where Jesus himself says this:
This is a clear contradiction with quote above Exodus 33:20
Suppose you're debating a non Christian and he\she presents you with this problem.
How would you as an apologist explain this contradiction?
The question that I asked myself was how long did God rest, or how long was the seventh day while God rested?
If you look throughout both the Old and New Testaments, after the first six days of creation, there is nothing as epic created, until about the Books of Revelations.
In Revelations, an entire bejeweled city; Heavenly Jerusalem, descends from the sky, with Satan out of the picture. This is epic stuff and shows God is getting back to work. After the 1000 year reign of peace, the old heaven and earth of Genesis, goes away and God creates a new heaven and earth. God is back 100%. But until then, God rested, and others forces were in charge; Satan then Jesus.
Thank you for your comment.
You seem to imply that God is still at rest even today, all until second coming of Christ when his rest will end. and during that time Satan is in charge?
This can be easily refuted since throughout 7-th day and until heavenly Jerusalem God is pretty busy waging wars and doing all sorts of things, so it's kind of incorrect to say that God is still at rest.
Holly spirit for example does not rest at all, it is always present to guide the church: John 16:13 and Luke 12:11-12
I want to hear from other fellow Christians their interpretation of the John 1:18a:
See also Exodus 33:20
Here is an argument:
The issue here is not whether Jesus is God or not because John 1:18b says "The only Son, God"
- No one has ever seen God
- People (Jews) saw Jesus
- Therefore Jesus is not God
So the argument above can easily be refuted with:
- No one has ever seen God (the Father)
- People saw Jesus (the Son)
- Therefore Jesus (the Son) is not the Father
We know the definition of holly trinity is that:
The Son IS NOT the Father IS NOT holly ghost, but all of which IS ONE GOD.
Therefore problem seems to be solved but...
However it's not that easy!
Consider another verse from John 14:9 where Jesus himself says this:
This is a clear contradiction with quote above Exodus 33:20
Suppose you're debating a non Christian and he\she presents you with this problem.
How would you as an apologist explain this contradiction?