In all fairness, this thread was started to invite questions as to whether Mormons preach a contradictory gospel--we ought to be prepared for affirmative answers, and with a little more than "don't go there."
Baerly, I clicked on that link and I read through the reams of quotes under the three topics. Only the first quoted actual doctrine--that is, words from the Bible, Book of Mormon, Pearl of Great Price, or Doctrine and Covenants. Those are the standard works of our church. Yes, I know that many of those quotes are from general authorities, but words of these men can only become doctrine after churchwide approveal, after which they are added to the Doctrine and Covenants.
Some of these books you are quoting have been specifically challenged by the church--specifically Pratt's The Seer, which he wrote during a period of excommunication for preaching false doctrine. Is this where you get your authoritative comments on our beliefs?
The third category was so laughable as to throw the entire website into a bad light. Mormon women need men to reach the Celestial Kingdom? Sure enough, there are two quotes, and both of them are horribly mangled railsplits! If you read the rest of books in question, you'll find that men need women as much as women need men. They need each other, just as Paul said, "neither the man without the woman, nor the woman without the man, in the Lord."
Let's see: first one is partly doctrine--that as God is, man may become--but as that part's supported by the Bible (Children of God, and joint-heirs with Christ) it cannot be construed as contradictory. Second part is non-doctrinal in premise, and unsupported by any scriptural quotes. Third I've already covered, and even if it was true, when you read the whole thing it's a Biblical doctrine.
That's three strikes. For next time, may I recommend you find out what we actually teach in Sunday-school classes, rather than what some guy said a hundred years ago that didn't make it into the books.
