BUDDY
User of Aspercreme
US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
The full report from the Brookhaven National Laboratory here
Call me a denier if you like as I don't look at that as a negative, but it seems to me that evidence is taking the place of the fear from the Environmental Movement and the evidence is suggesting that man made global warming is a myth.
Thoughts?
Washington DC An abundance of new peer-reviewed studies, analyses, and data error discoveries in the last several months has prompted scientists to declare that fear of catastrophic man-made global warming bites the dust and the scientific underpinnings for alarm may be falling apart. The latest study to cast doubt on climate fears finds that even a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide would not have the previously predicted dire impacts on global temperatures. This new study is not unique, as a host of recent peer-reviewed studies have cast a chill on global warming fears.
Anthropogenic (man-made) global warming bites the dust, declared astronomer Dr. Ian Wilson after reviewing the new study which has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Geophysical Research. Another scientist said the peer-reviewed study overturned in one fell swoop the climate fears promoted by the UN and former Vice President Al Gore. The study entitled Heat Capacity, Time Constant, and Sensitivity of Earths Climate System, was authored by Brookhaven National Lab scientist Stephen Schwartz. (LINK)
Effectively, this (new study) means that the global economy will spend trillions of dollars trying to avoid a warming of ~ 1.0 K by 2100 A.D. Dr. Wilson wrote in a note to the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee on August 19, 2007. Wilson, a former operations astronomer at the Hubble Space Telescope Institute in Baltimore MD, was referring to the trillions of dollars that would be spent under such international global warming treaties like the Kyoto Protocol.
Previously, I have indicated that the widely accepted values for temperature increase associated with a doubling of CO2 were far too high i.e. 2 4.5 Kelvin. This new peer-reviewed paper claims a value of 1.1 +/- 0.5 K increase for a doubling of CO2, he added.
The full report from the Brookhaven National Laboratory here
Call me a denier if you like as I don't look at that as a negative, but it seems to me that evidence is taking the place of the fear from the Environmental Movement and the evidence is suggesting that man made global warming is a myth.
Thoughts?