Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You said it!What do they expect when they dress and act so slutty.
What do they expect when they dress and act so slutty.
I always wondered, is there actually a higher incidence of sexual abuse among the clergy than the general populace? Because without that we can't really establish that their behavior is caused by vows of celibacy.Well Auto what do you expect in an organization that requires it's clearly to suppress a basic human instinct? I've been saying for years that celibacy warps those Priests' brains.
Good for you.Auto, you do seem to have a thing for the Catholics! I was a Catholic as a small boy and an altar boy and all the priests I was involved with were great guys. I was an atheist by ten but they were always happy to argue on a level that I could understand
and I always appreciated that, it was never an issue and neither was buggery.
Even if the data showed a higher rate of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy, it'd be hard to draw a causal link back to celibacy, since the sexual predators in the general population don't have the benefit of an organization that covers up their crimes and shuffles them around to new locations with new victims. That probably skews the data.I always wondered, is there actually a higher incidence of sexual abuse among the clergy than the general populace? Because without that we can't really establish that their behavior is caused by vows of celibacy.
I always wondered, is there actually a higher incidence of sexual abuse among the clergy than the general populace? Because without that we can't really establish that their behavior is caused by vows of celibacy.
Good for you.
Since I got married, the church where I got married (my wife is Catholic) has had one former priest arrested on sexual abuse charges and another one named in a civil lawsuit.
Even if the data showed a higher rate of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy, it'd be hard to draw a causal link back to celibacy, since the sexual predators in the general population don't have the benefit of an organization that covers up their crimes and shuffles them around to new locations with new victims. That probably skews the data.
But if the criticism is based on the bad that happens can they not defend that by the good that they might do. It must be a two way street if that is the criteria. And to say that large organisations do not ignore or cover up sexual predation, at least at high level, is just head in the sand. Are Catholic clergy more prone than the general population to sexual abuse because of their religion? I doubt it very much, how are they different from their flock? They are not celibate. Are Catholic clergy less likely to be prosecuted...undoubtedly. I do not understand the Churches attitude to these problems. If the Church cast each perpetrator to the wolves then they could take the high ground but they don't. Or at least did not, I think they will now (at least in litigious societies) but that is mainly because they have been caught, not because they think it's right. I'd be very surprised if the Catholic Church is in control of much of it's empire but a pervert is an individual and as such should not be in a position to bring it down unless they support him.
Try this: Vatican confirms report of sexual abuse and rape of nuns by priests in 23 countries - Europe, World - The IndependentThe link doesn't work for me.
On this issue, they can only justify the bad with the good if they somehow need to shelter predators in order to do charity. They don't.But if the criticism is based on the bad that happens can they not defend that by the good that they might do. It must be a two way street if that is the criteria.
I'm certain that sexual predation happens in other organizations. The difference between them and the Catholic Church, apparently, is that when it comes to light in other organizations, the conspirators and higher-ups who enabled the crimes go to jail.And to say that large organisations do not ignore or cover up sexual predation, at least at high level, is just head in the sand.
Probably not individually, but still, all indications are that this problem within the Catholic Church is something that's on an unprecedented scale. The Church's sheer size, along with the societal regard given to clergy and Church leaders' own culpable actions in covering up the crimes of priests all worked together to create a problem of gigantic proportions.Are Catholic clergy more prone than the general population to sexual abuse because of their religion?
It seems to me that they're now willing to give up the individual predators, but they've still got their protective shield around the bishops and cardinals who enabled and abetted those predators with their cover-ups and inter-parish shuffling.I doubt it very much, how are they different from their flock? They are not celibate. Are Catholic clergy less likely to be prosecuted...undoubtedly. I do not understand the Churches attitude to these problems. If the Church cast each perpetrator to the wolves then they could take the high ground but they don't. Or at least did not, I think they will now (at least in litigious societies) but that is mainly because they have been caught, not because they think it's right.
The Vatican is very much in charge of things like its letter to the bishops of Ireland telling them not to report abusive priests to secular authorities.I'd be very surprised if the Catholic Church is in control of much of it's empire but a pervert is an individual and as such should not be in a position to bring it down unless they support him.