Yerda
Veteran Member
What about unearned money?I support capitalism because I do not believe in having the government take away people's hard earned money.
Easliy earned money?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What about unearned money?I support capitalism because I do not believe in having the government take away people's hard earned money.
What about unearned money?
Easliy earned money?
Actually, they do.The government does not have the right to rob Peter to pay Paul.
So the phrase "hard-earned" was dusting for anti-taxation rhetoric?The government does not have the right to rob Peter to pay Paul.
I've never met any kind of money other than "hard earned".So the phrase "hard-earned" was dusting for anti-taxation rhetoric?
Just hyperbole, or an deliberately dishonest and simplistic framing of a hugely complicated issue?
I've never met any kind of money other than "hard earned".
I wouldn't knock being rich by birth until I've tried it.Inheritence is a tough business.
I cannot stomach this capitalism. It just sucks.
It seems that those here who crow loudest about the evils of crony capitalism are most successful at voting in politicians who practice it.
Voting is less about ideology than blind team spirit.
It brings to mind why Ron Paul is The Man:Well, evil crony capitalism is an American value. Like MLB players taking steriods or mama buying apple pie from the grocery store.
The use of capital as a means of concentrating wealth and exploiting others is historically what the word capitalism has been taken to mean.Capitalism may suck, but what you're describing isn't capitalism.
It's a godawful mess of things -- a scramble for the wealthy to keep as much wealth as they can and get out of dodge before everything is gone.
Since the wealthy have control over the market and the laws that govern it, "capitalism" only guides the free market so far. The real wealth is for the elites and they don't care about anything except themselves - generally speaking.
Couldn't agree more Terry.Ireland should have let the Banks go bust and start with a clean slate. The real assets should have been frozen by the government, with out the possibility of foreclosure of customer's assets. . The power of the banks would have been broken, times would have been tough for a while, but not with the unlimited time scale that they are now subject to.