Sapiens
Polymathematician
Why would one not put the most accurate information available in texts? If you have more accurate information, make your case ... if you can't make your case (as seems to be the case) you might remember that it is better to keep quiet than to prove oneself a fool.Can you claim with a straight face that the evolutionary dogma is not inserted into every possible place in the textbooks students study?!
A ridiculously empty claim.Is this not truly "atheistic" nonsense. Try to check the manuals in school-textbooks and see how unnecessarily biased they are with 'atheistic nonsense.'
By and large the "bias" is for the truth.That while I surely am no professional, and am ignorant to some degree, I have clearly seen enough evidence of the extreme bias that atheists have pushed into our schools.
Chaos god? How quaint.From when I was young, the evolutionary concept and the insults to people who in schools believed in a creator rather than in the chaos god was never ending.
What you think is irrelevant, what is important is what you can rationally demonstrate.You might not think it 'atheistic nonsense', but I surely do.
Is it an insult to tell you that you are demonstrably wrong?So, one insult for another, isn't it.
I offer you the outlook of Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama:You may not lie by purpose because you simply don't see it as being truly wrong when people are force fed teaching that belongs to another 'faith' - the belief that all things made themselves, and that nothing intelligent caused neither the universe, nor complex ecosystems, fine tuning of the universe, and beautiful nature.
If scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims.
The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality (2005).
The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality (2005).