Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is it bad to ask questions. Please don't get angry. Sorry, if it disturbs one personally.Okay what the hell is with these questions? How is this a religious debate? You keep asking these questions like can science do this? what about thissssss????/ Is there a point? Do you think everyone thinks science can never have any issues with anything? People don't tend to treat science as a god unless they are ****ing stupid.
Any sane rational person knows that science is good but people can make mistakes ect which is why they look for evidence to back up what the scientist is saying. They look at the data . It's not authoritative either, I've heard various scientists say the ****ing dumbest **** on a regular basis. Mostly when it comes to their own beliefs.
Can science create a word* or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation**?
Please
Regards
__________
* + of a language
** +and not using anything in the Universe/s
One may like to read post #45 in another sub-forum.
God has created the universe/s and everything in it. God has created the inanimates/animates and the human beings*. God has taught the human beings the language/s while the others, the inanimates and animates except human beings have not been bestowed with any language/s. So, the question in this context is very much religious, one would agree. Isn't it? PleaseOkay what the hell is with these questions? How is this a religious debate? You keep asking these questions like can science do this? what about thissssss????/ Is there a point? Do you think everyone thinks science can never have any issues with anything? People don't tend to treat science as a god unless they are ****ing stupid.
Any sane rational person knows that science is good but people can make mistakes ect which is why they look for evidence to back up what the scientist is saying. They look at the data . It's not authoritative either, I've heard various scientists say the ****ing dumbest **** on a regular basis. Mostly when it comes to their own beliefs.
God has created the universe/s and everything in it. God has created the inanimates/animates and the human beings*. God has taught the human beings the language/s while the others, the inanimates and animates except human beings have not been bestowed with any language/s. So, the question in this context is very much religious, one would agree. Isn't it? Please
Regards
_____________
*Through the process of evolution in millions of years, of course as the science says, though there is nothing in writing with the science in this connection, as the matter is related to pre-pre-pre-pre-History.
I don't agree with one.You belive these things. But they are far from being proven. For example, that some deity taught humans how to use language is rather a silly proposition, don't you think?
I don't agree with one.
This is the reality, and God claims this, there is no other claimant, and science is dumb on it. Is there any other claimant? Please
Regards
Sorry, if one cannot see me showing.I don't see *any* claimant. Show me your God.
Sorry, if one cannot see me showing.
The claim could be made verbally?
Does one want that I must quote from Quran to show it to one? Please
Will that help? Please
Regards
Is it an acknowledgement that science cannot create a word or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation? PleaseNo it can't. Your question is due to you not understanding what science actually is despite years of people here, and other forums (you use the same username), explaining it to you.
Is it an acknowledgement that science cannot create a word or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation? Please
Regards
Is it an acknowledgement that science cannot create a word or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation? Please
Regards
I also used the word annihilation to elaborate meaning to cause to cease to exist or to do away with entirely so that none remains.I'm not 100% sure I understand your question. But if you're asking whether science can create "something" out of "nothing", I'd say two things:
- The definitions of "something" and "nothing" would need to be described very precisely.
- Maybe someday science will be able to do this.
Is it an acknowledgement that science cannot create a word
or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation? Please
Regards
As a rule, attempts to claim that God can do anything and human science can't are not likely to be well received.Is it bad to ask questions. Please don't get angry. Sorry, if it disturbs one personally.
What type of questions could be asked and what are not to be asked? Please
An inquisitive mind does ask questions. Is it wrong? Please
Regards
Terminologies are not words strictly speaking, that is why these are called terminologies .People can create any words they wish as words are part of language not something contained and developed only within science. Slang is an example of normal people creating words which have meaning. Scientists do make up words all the time for terminology.