Karl Streicher
Member
This is mainly for those of us in the U.S. but all are welcome to join in. Luckily for us the federal government made it acceptable to legally carry a concealed weapon in most states with one conceal/carry permit so one doesn't have to get a permit for each state they might choose to carry in which makes complete sense to me. The way I look at it if you are not a convicted felon or have been judged legally insane there is absolutely no reason you shouldn't be able to carry with or without a permit but the powers that be must have their piece of paper so that is what you must do.
Now the question is which do you or would you carry and why?
Personally I lean towards revolvers for two main reasons, all you have to do is pull the trigger and you don't have brass flying all over the place which I think is an important consideration and I will expain why. I worked as a buyer for a number of years at a company that bought guns from manufacturers and sold to gun shops and licensed FFL holders and we also sold class III weapons to Law enforcement along with flash bangs, rubber ball grenades etc. so we had law enforcement agents come in from time to time. One day after business was done and we were just sitting around BS'ing I asked a question that had been on my mind for a while.
My idea was that most perpetrators of personal crimes have graduated to that from less serious crimes and that being the case means that most of them probably have an extensive arrest record and most likely a few enemies. How much time will the police spend looking for the killer of a known criminal if there is no evidence other than a bullet? I ran this by the agent and he told me they probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of resources on it, now if it were Mr. or Mrs. law abiding citizen yes they would make a serious effort but in the end no brass equals one less piece of evidence- what do you think?
Now the question is which do you or would you carry and why?
Personally I lean towards revolvers for two main reasons, all you have to do is pull the trigger and you don't have brass flying all over the place which I think is an important consideration and I will expain why. I worked as a buyer for a number of years at a company that bought guns from manufacturers and sold to gun shops and licensed FFL holders and we also sold class III weapons to Law enforcement along with flash bangs, rubber ball grenades etc. so we had law enforcement agents come in from time to time. One day after business was done and we were just sitting around BS'ing I asked a question that had been on my mind for a while.
My idea was that most perpetrators of personal crimes have graduated to that from less serious crimes and that being the case means that most of them probably have an extensive arrest record and most likely a few enemies. How much time will the police spend looking for the killer of a known criminal if there is no evidence other than a bullet? I ran this by the agent and he told me they probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of resources on it, now if it were Mr. or Mrs. law abiding citizen yes they would make a serious effort but in the end no brass equals one less piece of evidence- what do you think?