Attention Atheists: Validity Issues

[Mister_T]

You can't use tools or natural procedures to prove such a concept as God...or anything supernatural. Just like you can't disprove him by those means.

You'll see were I'm going with this. I want to hear an atheist (specifically one who claims the non-existence of God to be a fact) perspective.

 

[ikitikitembo]

You'll see were I'm going with this. I want to hear an atheist (specifically one who claims the non-existence of God to be a fact) perspective.

Yeah, yeah I gotcha. Well there's plenty of them out there to challenge and it's interesting seeing what they have to say about disproving God lol. I'm in a debate right now with Tiberius about it. If you want to jump in it's on the Attention Atheists: Validity Issues (Restatements) post.

 

[Hacker]

So much so that evolution is almost certainly true.

Yes ALMOST, i'll accept that, that's all I was trying to debate with you, but you were trying to prove it as a fact, however, it's a HIGH possiblity! And your points are actually indeed very good! )(

 

[Hacker]

So magnificent, yet we get sick? We have an appendix we don't need? The eyes are quite weak compared to the eyes of other animals. We aren't magnificent.

Well, I do sometimes wonder why some of us have to get sick, but we do have a good defense mechanism(immune system.) I think it's amazing.

 

[Hacker]

sorry I keep double posting.

 

[rocketman]

Oh, I'm sorry, I thought finding the transitional forms of horses in the fossil record WAS A FACT.

Just in case anybody was interested in reading the other view.
Here, here and here seem interesting. And no. I'm not after a debate.

 

[Tiberius]

Okay, can you find a non-christian website that says evolution is bogus? Answers in genesis has an agenda and is hardly likely to present a balanced view. They are known for using false science and distorted facts in their arguments.