Astronomical events in Abrahamic religions

[gnostic]

No proof in science.

For math in bible we have Pi=3

Good one.

I'd guess I wasn't very specific as to what type of signs.

Yes, pi is a sign in maths, but I meant "prophetic signs".

It is the to-may-toe & to-mah-toe conundrum, all over again.

 

[Audie]

Good one.

I'd guess I wasn't very specific as to what type of signs.

Yes, pi is a sign in maths, but I meant "prophetic signs".

It is the to-may-toe & to-mah-toe conundrum, all over again.

You did mention math in the Bible.

And proof in science

I'm not interested in "signs".

Three black kites circling overhead is a Sign.

Of...?

( black kites are a common bird here in HK)

Google Image Result for https://photos.travelblog.net/96980/366525/f/3401714-black-kite-and-hk-skyline-0.jpg

 

[Subduction Zone]

You did mention math in the Bible.

And proof in science

I'm not interested in "signs".

Three black kites circling overhead is a Sign.

Of...?

( black kites are a common bird here in HK)

Google Image Result for https://photos.travelblog.net/96980/366525/f/3401714-black-kite-and-hk-skyline-0.jpg

Hmm, black is not a popular color for kites in the US. But I still found an image of three of them:

 

[Shaul]

No proof in science.

For math in bible we have Pi=3

Wrong. The Bible nowhere defines pi as equal to 3.

 

[Shaul]

In the Book of Joshua it records that the sun and the moon stopped in the sky during the battle at the valley of Aijalon.

 

[Audie]

Wrong. The Bible nowhere defines pi as equal to 3.

Wrong?
I didn't say it "defines" it so.
You are just playing strawman.

 

[Shaul]

Wrong?
I didn't say it "defines" it so.
You are just playing strawman.

You wrote, "For math in bible we have Pi=3". That is wrong. Nowhere in the Bible does it have Pi=3.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You wrote, "For math in bible we have Pi=3". That is wrong. Nowhere in the Bible does it have Pi=3.

1 Kings 7:23

King James Version

​

23 And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

 

[Audie]

You wrote, "For math in bible we have Pi=3". That is wrong. Nowhere in the Bible does it have Pi=3.

Try reading kings

 

[Shaul]

Try reading kings

I am very familiar with it. Nowhere in Kings does it have Pi=3.

 

[Audie]

Try reading kings

I am very familiar with it. Nowhere in Kings does it have Pi=3.

Suit yourself. We realize denial is a
necessity. It's like strawmen that way.
I'm very familiar with what I wrote.
You are still playing games,

 

[Shaul]

Suit yourself. We realize denial is a
necessity. It's like strawmen that way.
I'm very familiar with what I wrote.
You are still playing games,

It isn't denial on my part. You made an assertion you have not and cannot support.

 

[Audie]

It isn't denial on my part. You made an assertion you have not and cannot support.

Denying denial won't help anything.

You know the passage I refer to, and
choose to make false statements about it and about me.

I probably don't even want to know what your game is, but it strikes me a being tiresome and dishonest.

 

[Shaul]

Denying denial won't help anything.

You know the passage I refer to, and
choose to make false statements about it and about me.

I probably don't even want to know what your game is, but it strikes me a being tiresome and dishonest.

You've had an opportunity to support your assertion. You haven't.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Good one.

I'd guess I wasn't very specific as to what type of signs.

Yes, pi is a sign in maths, but I meant "prophetic signs".

It is the to-may-toe & to-mah-toe conundrum, all over again.

Personally I prefer the po-tay-toe & po-tah-toe conundrum.

Oddly enough neither of our 1 Kings debaters saw this:

1 Kings 7:23

King James Version
​

23 And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

 

[Audie]

You've had an opportunity to support your assertion. You haven't.

Pretending you don't know the passage?
I'm not the one playing dumb.

 

[Shaul]

Pretending you don't know the passage?
I'm not the one playing dumb.

You are the one playing games. If you can support your claim do it.

 

[Audie]

You are the one playing games. If you can support your claim do it.

Support your claim to know Kings by quoting
the passage that presents the numbers
showing the value of pi is 3. If you are not just playing games

Do you or don't you know the passage?

I don't just say things. I know the passage,
I know the numbers they give..

Your denial plus strawman does add up to much.

 

[Shaul]

Support your claim to know Kings by quoting
the passage that presents the numbers
showing the value of pi is 3. If you are not just playing games

Do you or don't you know the passage?

I don't just say things. I know the passage,
I know the numbers they give..

Your denial plus strawman does add up to much.

You made the claim "For math in bible we have Pi=3". The onus is on you to provide the evidence for that claim. I don't have the onus to provide the citations to support your claims, you do. I don't have to try to guess the passages of which you are thinking.

 

[Audie]

You made the claim "For math in bible we have Pi=3". The onus is on you to provide the evidence for that claim. I don't have the onus to provide the citations to support your claims, you do. I don't have to try to guess the passages of which you are thinking.

True, you don't have to guess, as you've
known all along.
Unless you've some new explanation
for how 10 units diameter and 30 of
circumference does not yield pi=3
( I've already heard that they used different
cubits for D and for C) then you've nothing to
add ( or subtract, nuktiply or divide) regsrding my
observation about Bible math, but are
merely being tiresome, trying to goad me.