Sultan Of Swing
Well-Known Member
This is not presuppositional apologetics, not at all. Whenever you read the word 'presupposition', don't assume I am engaging in some presuppositional argument for God's existence.You can't use your conclusion as evidence for the thing you're trying to establish.
This so-called reality is not self evident.. presuppositional apologetics does not solve this problem. It is merely circular reasoning with big words. 'God exists because if you presupposed he exists it would be self evident to you.' That is utter gibberish. What is it that you calling 'common justice and law' that necessitates such a reality?
We were not addressing the existence of God. I was addressing the question, given God exists and that He has revealed Himself as described in the Scriptures, how does one determine Him moral? Given we have no objective moral standard, it is a presuppositional problem in the sense that it requires an objective foundation, and, given God is who He is as revealed in the Scriptures, I trust His claim that He is that objective foundation.