Granted The accuracy of these events and places don’t tell us that the gospels are necessarily historical buy they tell us that the authors of the gospels had access to good sources of information,
This is meaningless. That I have "access to good information" about my friend does not at all substantiate that what I claim about my friend, particularly when my claims are completely implausible and fantastical, are actually true.
Again, bookstores all over the world are filled with novels that contain stories with accurate geographical, cultural, historical, even biographical information in them. That does not at all tell us that the stories they contain are actually true.
therefore they were in a position to know about Jesus and his life.
That isn't a given at all either. We have no clue who they were or what their specific sources of information about Jesus were, even if they had access to generally accurate information tbat a city exists named Jerusalem and so on.
So unless you what to affirm that they were intentionally lying, we should trust them as good reliable sources.
Faulty reasoning from start to finish there.
....how many times must I explain it? Because they are filled on every page with completely fantastical stories that is the stuff of myth. Because they are clear literary constructions. Because they have a clear apologetic function. Need I go on?
So what? Jesus was a Jew, why wouldn’t he use the “number 12” ?..........
In the Gospel of Mark, the number 12 appears more than once. Not only does Jesus have 12 Apostles, he also magically heals a 12 year old girl on her deathbed, on the way to which he magically heals a woman who has had some bleeding condition for 12 years, and there are 12 baskets of bread leftover after he magically multiplies food to feed the 5,000.
So this is an indication that the number 12 has a literary (and theological) function for the Gospel writer. Again, this is not history.
No if you remove all that, you end up with a Jew, that had many followers and disciples,
No, we went over that. That he was a celebrity with thousands of fanatical devotees who wandered around the countryside with him is wildly implausible. So nix that.
who claimed to be divine,
How is that aim no theologically motivated?
Nix that.
No, we went over that. His baptism is an absurdly theatrical supernatural event. Nix that.
who had brothers and sisters,
Not attested to by Paul, but okay...
who traveled trough differents towns in Palestine,
Even Jesus' travel in Mark is a literary construction. I can explain in further detail later.
who did stuff that people interpreted as miracles,
We're eliminating supernaturalism. So nix that.
who had some problems with the Jewish Sanhedrin,
Obviously a theological motivation there. The whole point of Christianity, theologically, is a rebellion against mainstream Judaism. So nix that.
was crucified, buried, whose tomb was found empty, etc.
Again, thoroughly myth-laden and theologically motivated telling of events there. So nix that.
So in the end we've got...a Jew existed. Who maybe had siblings.
....mkay.