I've just reread Quantum physics and the end of naturalism. I don't understand it.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
... and the end of naturalism
- Thread starter Jayhawker Soule
- Start date
Not sure I do either. Thanks for posting this to read.
I will note that I disagree with this statement from just prior to his conclusions: "Embracing brute chance by denying that every contingent event must have an explanation is the pathway to epistemic nihilism. An explanation must exist."
I'm not sure why an explanation MUST exist; I don't really see an argument that this must be the case. Even if an explanation must exist, I don't see any reason why it would necessarily be something that humans could comprehend. Perhaps at some time in the future...
Given the language used - accusing naturalism of conceit, for example - I checked, and wonder of wonders, the author is a supporter of intelligent design. Cor, even though I don't understand all this stuff, I suspect when such language is used it betrays things, and especially when he mentions NDEs as some kind of evidence not even worth bothering with (must be true) - as for some others.
I'll wait until there is better evidence thanks.
It's easy to understand.
It makes no cogent argument
The science mentioned is just to
give an impression of sophistication.
As Pauli would describe it...
Das is nicht nur nicht richtig,
es ist nicht einmal falsch.
English translation...
It's meaningless bunk.
Last edited:
Regiomontanus
Ματαιοδοξία ματαιοδοξιών! Όλα είναι ματαιοδοξία.
The Discovery Institute. LOL